Allowed Reactions: Process 1-5 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter genloz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the classification of five particle reaction processes in terms of their allowed interactions under the standard model. Processes 1 and 2 are deemed not possible due to violations of lepton number and strangeness conservation, while both are identified as weak interactions. Process 3 raises questions about spin conservation, leading to uncertainty about its feasibility, although it is suggested to be a weak interaction. Processes 4 and 5 are debated regarding their conservation laws, with process 4 being considered possible due to conserved baryon and spin numbers, while process 5 faces challenges due to strangeness conservation. Overall, the participants seek clarification on the categorization of these processes and their interactions.
genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I would really just like to know if I'm on the right track here in terms of if reactions can go ahead or not... The reactions are in latex and my thoughts are below each one..

Homework Statement


For each of the following processes say whether it is a strong, electromagnetic or weak process or whether it is forbidden in the standard model and explain the reasons.

Process 1
K^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+e^{-}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - no baryons
Spin - (-1/3)(1/3) -> (2/3)(1/3) + (1/2) not conserved
Strangeness - not conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 2
e^{-}+p \rightarrow n+\upsilon_{\mu} (the final thing should be a muon neutrino)
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - (1/2) + (1/2) -> (1/2) + (0) not conserved
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 3
\Delta^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+n
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - ? -> 0 + (1/2) no idea
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 4
K^{0} + n \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (s in the K, anti-s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin & baryon number)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 5
\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (ss in the Xi, s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction


Also, In what situation would it be a strong interaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think processes 3,4 and 5 are strong interactions rather than weak...
 
Okay, process 3 also isn't possible due to the delta having spin 3/2, the pion having spin 0 and the neutron having spin 1/2 so this is also impossible due to spin not being conserved?

Process 4
Baryon Number 0 + 1 -> 1 + 0, conserved
Spin 0 + 1/2 -> 1/2 + 0, conserved
So process 4 is possible...

Process 5
Baryon Number 1 -> 1 + 0 conserved
Spin - can't find out the spin for Xi, -> 1/2 + 0
So it's not possible due to lack of strangeness conservation and possibly spin but unsure on this point??

Please let me know if I'm on the right track here!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top