An easy electrodynamics question, and yet

  • Thread starter Thread starter swindhspectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrodynamics
AI Thread Summary
Two identical conducting spheres, initially charged with 12.0 nC and 16.0 nC, are connected by a wire, allowing charge redistribution to achieve equilibrium. The average charge after equilibrium is 14.0 nC on each sphere. The electric force between the spheres can be calculated using Coulomb's Law, but the initial calculation of 0.000014 N was incorrect due to significant digit errors. The importance of using three significant digits in calculations is emphasized, especially when submitting online. Understanding charge redistribution and equilibrium is crucial for solving such electrodynamics problems accurately.
swindhspectrum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My first homework assignment for griffiths is underway.
Here is a problem I can't figure out.

Q. Two identical conducting small spheres are placed with their centers
0.350 meters apart. One is given a charge of 12.0 nC and the other
is given a charge of 16.0 nC The spheres are connected by a
conducting wire. Find the electric force between the two after
equilibrium has occurred.

A. I used Coulombs Law to arrive at .000014 N. This is incorrect. My reasoning was that the conducting wire would allow electrons to redistribute themselves giving the two spheres the same charge which is the average of the two initial charges. I must not understand the concept of equilibrium correctly. I would ask the instructor but the faculty at my institution is on strike presently!

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, even given your assumption (which feels right to me), I don't get the same answer as you do - I'm different by some exponent of 10. Are you certain about your answer?

Also, I think there should be 3 significant digits in your answer.
 
You were right in that it was a problem with the number of significant digits used. The homework is submitted online and the site used is a bit touchy.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top