An electron is fired at a nonconducting infinite sheet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mauve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Infinite
AI Thread Summary
To solve for the electric field (E) and surface charge density (σ) related to an electron fired at a nonconducting infinite sheet, it's essential to understand the standard results for the electric field and potential of a uniformly charged sheet. If these concepts are not in your notes, deriving them through integration is necessary. The discussion emphasizes that basic knowledge of electromagnetism is assumed, and comprehensive teaching is not feasible in the forum. Clarification on the source of learning, whether from university or self-study, is also sought. Understanding these foundational principles is crucial for progressing in the problem.
Mauve
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An electron initially 3.00 m from a nonconducting infinite sheet of uniformly distributed charge is fired toward the sheet. The electron has an initial speed of 420 m/s and travels along a line perpendicular to the sheet. When the electron has traveled 2.00 m, its velocity is instantaneously zero, and it then reverses its direction. What is the surface charge density on the sheet?
Relevant Equations
E = σ/(ε_0)
I've been thinking about this problem for some time now and think that I need to find E to solve for σ, but I have no idea how to go about that. How do I approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mauve said:
I've been thinking about this problem for some time now and think that I need to find E to solve for σ, but I have no idea how to go about that. How do I approach this problem?

Hint: motion represents kinetic energy.

That said, the field and potential for a uniformly charged sheet is a standard result. Are you sure you don't have it in your notes?

If not, you'll have to derive it through an integration process.
 
PeroK said:
Hint: motion represents kinetic energy.

That said, the field and potential for a uniformly charged sheet is a standard result. Are you sure you don't have it in your notes?

If not, you'll have to derive it through an integration process.

I'm sorry. I'm just unbelievably lost and don't know what you're talking about.
 
Mauve said:
I'm sorry. I'm just unbelievably lost and don't know what you're talking about.
Okay, but we can only help you on here. We can't teach you electromagnetism from the beginning.

Where are you learning this? At university or on your own?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top