Analyzing a Particle in a Box with 2D Space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a particle in a box divided into two compartments, with the Hamiltonian describing tunneling between them. The Hamiltonian is expressed in matrix form as a 2x2 matrix due to the two basis states, |R> and |L>, which represent the particle's position. Participants clarify that the matrix elements include transitions between the states, and all relevant elements must be considered. For calculating the probability of finding the particle in the left compartment at a later time, the time evolution operator is applied to the initial state, requiring decomposition into eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


A box containing a particle is divided into right and left compartments by a thin partition. We describe the position of the particle with a 2D space with basis states |R> and |L> according to whether the particle is in the right or left compartment. Thus, a generic state is written,

|\alpha> = \alpha_R |R> + \alpha_L |L>

The particle can tunnel through the partition, described by the Hamiltonian,

H = \Delta ( |R><L| + |L>< R|)

where delta is a real number with units of energy.

1. Write the Hamiltonian in matrix form. What are the energy eigenvalues and eigenvectors?

2. If at t=0 the particle is in the right compartment, what is the probability of finding it in the left compartment at a later time t?

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really understand how to get it in matrix form. I think I've got to use the basis states in the following manner:

\hat H = \hat 1 \hat H \hat 1 = \Sigma |L>< L|\hat H |R>< R|

So the matrix elements are given by <L|\hat H |R> correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct.
...what is your question?
 
kreil said:
So the matrix elements are given by <L|\hat H |R> correct?

Not just that one, though. This is a 2-state system, so the Hamiltonian will be a 2x2 matrix. One element will correspond to each of the possible transitions that can happen in the system. The one you've written down is one of them, so there are 3 others.
 
Thanks guys that helped a lot.

For part 2 I assume I should just apply the time evolution operator onto the initial state R and then square the resulting wave function to find the probability?
 
Yes. It's easiest to decompose your initial state into a superposition of eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, because you know how those evolve (that's why the first part of the problem asked you to find them.)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top