Analyzing Inelastic Collisions in 2-D: Solving for Final Velocity and Angle

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision scenario, a 950 kg car traveling at 16 m/s collides with a 1300 kg minivan moving at 21 m/s, resulting in both vehicles sticking together. The momentum conservation equations for both x and y components are set up to find the final speed and direction of the combined wreck. The confusion arises when dividing the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation to eliminate the final velocity, which is a valid mathematical approach as long as the denominators are not zero. This method allows for solving the angle of deflection without needing the final velocity directly. Understanding this technique is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
Hurricane3
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car with mass of 950 kg and speed of 16 m/s approches an intersection in the positive x direction. A 1300-kg minivan traveling at 21m/s is heading towards the same intersection in the positive y direction. The car and minivan collide and stick together. Fine the speed and direction of the wrecked vehicles just after the collision, assuming external forces can be ignored.


Homework Equations


p = mv
\sum p before = \sum after


The Attempt at a Solution



Well this question was grabbed from my physics textbook as an example question.

Here are the steps they preformed:

1. Set the initial x component of momentum equal to the final x component of momentum
m_{1}v_{1} = (m_{1} + m_{2})v_{f}cos\vartheta

2. Do the same of the y component of momentum.
m_{2}v_{2} = (m_{2} + m_{2})v_{f}sin\vartheta

I understand everything up to this part, but I got confused when they divide the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation. They did it to eliminate the final velocity, giving an equation solving for \vartheta alone.

My question is: Why is it that you can divide to eliminate variables??

Oh, and those are suppose to be subscripts, not superscripts...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta=1

Just put \sin\theta and \cos\theta

And unknown left is v(f)
 
Hurricane3 said:

Homework Statement


A car with mass of 950 kg and speed of 16 m/s approches an intersection in the positive x direction. A 1300-kg minivan traveling at 21m/s is heading towards the same intersection in the positive y direction. The car and minivan collide and stick together. Fine the speed and direction of the wrecked vehicles just after the collision, assuming external forces can be ignored.


Homework Equations


p = mv
\sum p before = \sum after


The Attempt at a Solution



Well this question was grabbed from my physics textbook as an example question.

Here are the steps they preformed:

1. Set the initial x component of momentum equal to the final x component of momentum
m_{1}v_{1} = (m_{1} + m_{2})v_{f}cos\vartheta

2. Do the same of the y component of momentum.
m_{2}v_{2} = (m_{2} + m_{2})v_{f}sin\vartheta

I understand everything up to this part, but I got confused when they divide the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation. They did it to eliminate the final velocity, giving an equation solving for \vartheta alone.

My question is: Why is it that you can divide to eliminate variables??

Oh, and those are suppose to be subscripts, not superscripts...

You can always divide two equations. If A = B and C=D, then the ratio A/C must equal B/D as long as C and D are not zero. This is a common trick.
 
ahh okay thanks.

i never did it this way before :shy:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top