MHB Angular Speed of Smaller Wheel

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel, the relationship between the linear speeds of both wheels must be used, given by the equations v = rω1 and v = Rω2. With r at 6 cm and R at 10 cm, and the larger wheel's angular speed (ω2) at 100 rpm, the formula ω1 = (Rω2)/r leads to ω1 = (10 * 100)/6. This calculation results in ω1 = 500/3 rpm. Converting this to radians per minute gives the final answer as 1000π/3 radians/min.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Let r = radius

See picture.

If r = 6 cm, R = 10 cm, and the angular speed of the larger wheel is 100 rpm, determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel in radians per minute.

Again, 1 revolution = 2 pi radians.

I need to use w = θ/t.

So, θ = 100 rpm • 2 pi radians.

θ = 200 pi radians

w = 200 pi radians/min, which is my answer.

At this point, I doubted that my answer is right because it did not take long to find w or omega representing the angular speed.

The book's answer is 1000/3 radians/min.

What did I forget to do?

View attachment 7910
 

Attachments

  • sDraw_2018-03-07_02-12-51.png
    sDraw_2018-03-07_02-12-51.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 121
Mathematics news on Phys.org
f r = 6 cm, R = 10 cm, and the angular speed of the larger wheel is 100 rpm, determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel in radians per minute.

$v = r \omega_1$, where $\omega_1$ is the angular speed of the smaller wheel

$v = R \omega_2$, where $\omega_2$ is the angular speed of the larger wheel.

the belt connecting the two wheels has a fixed linear speed, $v$ ...

$\implies r \omega_1 = R \omega_2$

$\omega_1 = \dfrac{R \omega_2}{r} = \dfrac{10 \cdot 100}{6} = \dfrac{500}{3} \, rpm$

convert $\omega_1$ to radians per minute ...

$\dfrac{500 \, rev}{3 \, min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \, rad}{rev} = \dfrac{1000\pi}{3} \, rad/min$
 
Nicely-done. I will try your solution steps for this question to answer the textbook question where r = 6 cm and R = 10 cm.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top