Answer: Volume of 4π/3 x 6495kg/m³ x 0.026m³ in kg

  • Thread starter Thread starter you_of_eh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The calculation involves finding the volume using the formula 4π/3 x 6495 kg/m³ x (0.026 m)³, which results in units of kilograms since the cubic meters cancel out. The primary concern is ensuring the answer is expressed with the correct number of significant figures. The integers 4 and 3 have unlimited significant figures, while the value 0.026 has two significant figures, which dictates the final answer's precision. Therefore, after performing the computation, the result should be rounded to two significant figures. The final answer will be expressed in kilograms.
you_of_eh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Express the answer with the correct units and to the correct number of significant digits:

4pi/3(6495 kg/m^3)(0.026m)^3

-I know that the units in the answer would be kg because the m^3's will cancel.
-It is the sig figs that are giving me trouble. (perhaps the "pi" is screwing me up)

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The "4" and the "3" seem to be integers and have unlimited significant figures, thereby not limiting the figures in the result. The 0.026 seems to have the fewest, therefore, TWO significant figures. Adjust your answer to two significant figures (AFTER performing your computation, not before).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top