Ansys Maxwell: Transient generator simulation torque fluctuation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a simulation of an axial flux generator with two rotors and one stator, where the user is experiencing confusion regarding torque fluctuations despite satisfactory output voltages. The stator material was switched to air from electrical steel laminated, which initially caused torque peaks of 2Nm. The user notes that, without a core, there should be no cogging torque, and questions why the torque curve switches signs unexpectedly. There is speculation about whether the coils are treated as ideal or if they have ohmic resistance, which could influence the torque behavior. The conversation highlights the complexities of simulating motional EMF and the potential impact of the generator's poles acting as a capacitor in the system.
piyushverma
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
while simulation for a PM axial flux generator at no load 1000RPM, shows moving torque fluctuating between -0.7 to 0.7 Nm, which should have been 0, as there is no load attached and it is coreless design so no cogging torque as well. Need someone to help me out.
I am working on an axial flux generator design, I consisits of 2 rotors and one stator, there are 6 pole pairs and 9 coils. Here is my simulation setup
1633896416091.png

The three phase windings are connected in star configuration through Maxwell circuit.
I created two bands enclosing each rotor and then united them to assign a single band for both rotor which is set to rotational motion at 1000RPM constant. I am getting satisfactory results for output voltages, what I don't understand is this torque curve
1633896579895.png

currently the stator material is air ( I switched to air after setting it initially to electrical steel laminated, which resulted in 2Nm peaks in torque).
I don't understand the reason for this torque as there is no core so no cogging torque and also there is no load connected.
I am stuck, Kindly help :(
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Any generator that relies on motional EMF has a very low current when rotating even in the presence of no external load.

On second thought it puzzles me that the Torque switches sign, according to my explanation it should 've been only negative (or only positive, depending how you define positive or negative here).

Something else, the coils are assumed to be ideal or have ohmic resistance? I think I might be able to explain this if the coils are not ideal.
 
Last edited:
The poles of the generator act as a capacitor that serves as some sort of external load. Depending on how you have setup your simulation software, it might be able to "see" this capacitor and include it in an implicit way in its calculations.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top