Any particular word(s), phrase(s), etc. you particularly despise?

  • Thread starter Mathnomalous
  • Start date
In summary, the phrase "good job" can be seen as pretentious and condescending, while "any" is often used without a specific qualifier to mean "anyone", which can be seen as unprofessional. "Irregardless" is often used when what is being said overrides the fact that something may be irrelevant. "It's time to get hot." is a way of saying "thank you for asking." without actually saying anything. "Recently, it has been really annoying when I see someone type "should of" instead of "should have". And the title of the thread isn't redundant. The two "particulars" are describing two different things and they're both used correctly. Would despising any particular words
  • #106
Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
turbo-1 said:
Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.

While I might sometimes say one in place of the other in drunken conversation, I don't think of them as meaning the same thing. To me, "utilize" is technological whereas "use" is more pedestrian. The dictionary might disagree with me, though.
 
  • #108
lisab said:
Oh, that reminds me of one that makes me crazy!
Well, I'm glad that we finally got to the bottom of that mystery. :rolleyes:
 
  • #109
Moving/going forward. Will grammar books soon be teaching us that verbs have past tense, present tense, and going forward tense?
 
  • #110
Calling a person an "individual." Seems to be used a lot by police and ex-military.
 
  • #111
turbo-1 said:
Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.

What turbo said.

Add to that: anyone who refers to themselves as "myself" when they aren't talking about themselves being alone. "I am by myself" is fine. "Please respond to myself", and I want to smack you upside the head for saying that.
 
  • #112
turbo-1 said:
There is no "I" in team.

Although, as Hugh Laurie pointed out in "House: MD", there is a "me" if you shuffle the letters around a bit.

Okay, that was a stroke of brilliance on the part of the writer rather than Hugh, but I can't recall the name thereof.
 
  • #113
GeorginaS said:
"Please respond to myself", and I want to smack you upside the head for saying that.

I see your smack, and raise you a grenade down his pants.
 
  • #114
Jack21222 said:
It actually means quite the opposite...

my thinking was this. The person says something insulting about a certain class of people... then realizes members from that class of people is present. So they add "present company excluded" to cover themselves. But that's just really another insult to the perception of the said company.

Also... it was a joke...
 
  • #115
turbo-1 said:
Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.

How about "usage"? A long time ago I did a stint in retail, and the manager once asked if I could tidy up a back room shelf with lots of little odds and ends on it. The words she used:
"Try to maximize the usage of the spaceage." And she was totally serious. I said "You mean optimize the use of space?" And I could see the wheels spinning for a while.
 
  • #116
Chi Meson said:
And I could see the wheels spinning for a while.

:smile:
I so love it when that happens, but always regret when it happens without an appreciative audience.
 
  • #117
Danger said:
:smile:
I so love it when that happens, but always regret when it happens without an appreciative audience.
Yes, sadly, no one else was around. :(
 
  • #118
GeorginaS said:
Add to that: anyone who refers to themselves as "myself" when they aren't talking about themselves being alone. "I am by myself" is fine. "Please respond to myself", and I want to smack you upside the head for saying that.

How about "I'm standing beside myself..."
 
  • #119
mugaliens said:
How about "I'm standing beside myself..."

I would immediately accuse him of being schizoid, but I'm somewhat uncouth in personal communications.
 
  • #120
lisab said:
Right, so then it's settled. Aluminum it is. In the interest of efficiency, of course :biggrin:.

What just happened here?

Ubuntu runs an auto-spell check on every text box I type in and Aluminum constantly has a red line under it.
Then again, so does the word Ubuntu. It can't even spell it's own name.
 
  • #121
jarednjames said:
What just happened here?

Verbal jiu jitsu :devil:.
 
  • #122
jarednjames said:
What just happened here? Then again, so does the word Ubuntu. It can't even spell it's own name.
:smile:

Danger said:
Unless they are exactly equal in their arrival times, which is physically impossible, we would follow the traffic regulations. The first one has the right-of-way, then the next in line. If there is doubt as to who is next, the one to the right of the first goes next.
If it is unclear as to who was there first, we would sit around for about 5 minutes, and then all drive into a cluster-**** in the middle at the same time. We're polite, but not always overly brilliant.

That's why we invented roundabouts. (Disclaimer: I don't know if we invented roundabouts.)
Unless they're mini-roundabouts, in which case trouble ensues.
Do you have roundabouts in Canada? I gather from The Simpsons they're not in the US.
 
  • #123
nobahar said:
:smile:



That's why we invented roundabouts. (Disclaimer: I don't know if we invented roundabouts.)
Unless they're mini-roundabouts, in which case trouble ensues.
Do you have roundabouts in Canada? I gather from The Simpsons they're not in the US.

While isolated specimens can be found, they so rare as to render the species ecologically extinct. Iow, they cannot comingle to mate and multiply. Probably a climate thing.
 
  • #124
How about "for all intensive purposes"?
 
  • #125
Ben Niehoff said:
How about "for all intensive purposes"?

Do people actually say that?

Correct = "for all intents and purposes" isn't it?
 
  • #126
jarednjames said:
Do people actually say that?

Correct = "for all intents and purposes" isn't it?

People say it, yes, and they insist I am wrong when I correct them. At best they'll concede that maybe the phrase has two equally-correct versions. :\
 
  • #127
Ben Niehoff said:
People say it, yes, and they insist I am wrong when I correct them. At best they'll concede that maybe the phrase has two equally-correct versions. :\
There are dictionaries and class courses for people like that.
 
  • #128
Ben Niehoff said:
How about "for all intensive purposes"?

Nice.

I saw "albeit" written as "all be it" once. By an otherwise intelligent person, even.
 
  • #129
Ben Niehoff said:
How about "for all intensive purposes"?
Oh, that's a good one!
 
  • #130
OK, one that's always bothered me:

"a myriad of" in place of simply "myriad"

Apparently though, the wrongness of the former is rapidly fading; it has been declared OK to use in myriad sources.
 
  • #131
Another one becoming quite prevalent is "per say".

However, I think the one thing the drives me the most nuts (aside from what's already been written) is people using "everyday" as an adverb (in place of "every day").
 
  • #132
As a food lover, I just cringe when ever I hear the term "au jus" misused, which is all of the time.

Au jus is the French term for "with juice", the juice being the natural juices from the meat, as in "roast beef au jus" (roast beef with juice). It is not "roast beef with au jus", which would be "roast beef with with juice".
 
  • #133
Got, i have got drives me nuts.
 
  • #134
Ben Niehoff said:
However, I think the one thing the drives me the most nuts (aside from what's already been written) is people using "everyday" as an adverb (in place of "every day").

That would be one of those everyday annoyances, wouldn't it?
 
  • #135
Frankly

Honestly
 
  • #136
Literally, when not used literally. :frown:
 
  • #137
Hurkyl said:
Literally, when not used literally. :frown:
There's an auto insurance commercial in heavy rotation in which a woman says that when she saw her quote "I literally fell out of my chair." Ack!
 
  • #138
Evo said:
As a food lover, I just cringe when ever I hear the term "au jus" misused, which is all of the time.

Au jus is the French term for "with juice", the juice being the natural juices from the meat, as in "roast beef au jus" (roast beef with juice). It is not "roast beef with au jus", which would be "roast beef with with juice".

Add to that the fact that most people neglect to pronounce the S in "jus". Just because a word is French doesn't not mean you can just ignore any final consonants.
 
  • #139
Ben Niehoff said:
Add to that the fact that most people neglect to pronounce the S in "jus". Just because a word is French doesn't not mean you can just ignore any final consonants.

I thought you only pronounced the final consonant if it is followed by a vowel? (Vowel must be in the same word)
 
  • #140
Back to the subject at hand, as per another thread:

When people use weight when they mean mass. (For example "It weighs 20kg")

I know it isn't such a massive issue in everyday life, what with Earths gravity being fairly consistent and the subject of conversations generally being about an object on Earth, but it really does bug me.
 

Similar threads

Anyone sick and tired of all the fancy techy stuffs?
Replies
22
Views
1K
Home Repair & Maintenance Advice for Newbie?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Forum game: Finding the Golden Record
Replies
1
Views
2K
A "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
2
Replies
62
Views
5K
Job Skills Overwhelmed by Choices: Seeking Advice on Staying Engaged with Project
Replies
21
Views
699
The Scientist as Hero - or not
Replies
1
Views
2K
Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
Replies
4
Views
1K
Correct phrasing / use of vocabulary for SR
3
Replies
79
Views
10K
Engineering University student with no direction
Replies
11
Views
2K
News What Are Payroll Tax Supported Programs to You?
2
Replies
69
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top