Approximate transmission coefficient of a square barrier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the transmission coefficient for electrons encountering a square barrier with a height of 0.01 keV and a width of 5 nm. The participants are attempting to use the approximation formula for the transmission coefficient, but there is confusion regarding the integral part of the equation. Initially, one participant calculated a transmission coefficient of approximately 0.96x10^-38, but later realized mistakes in their calculations, particularly regarding units and square roots. After corrections, they arrived at a more reasonable value, indicating that the calculations are sensitive to the parameters used. The conversation highlights the importance of careful attention to detail in physics calculations.
bobby.pdx
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two conductors are separated by an insulator. Model the insulator as a square barrier of height 0.01 keV and a width of 5nm. Determine the transmission coefficients for electrons of 7,000 meV.

The only thing is I have to use the approximation formula for finding the transmission coefficient of a barrier with arbitrary shape.

Homework Equations



T(E)≈exp((-2/hbar)√(2m)∫√(U(x)-E)dx)


The Attempt at a Solution



T(E)≈exp((-2/1.973keVA/c)√(2(511keV/c))∫(U(x)-E)dx)

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do for the ∫(U(x)-E)dx part. I solved the problem using the formula for the transmission coefficient for a square barrier and I got T≈0.96x10^-38. I'm pretty certain this is correct because there was a very similar example in my book.

That formula had a (U-E) where I used 0.01keV-7000meV=.003keV

If I enter .003keV for U(x)-E then I would get ≈(.907)^x

And this is where I get stuck because I should somehow get an answer that is close to T≈0.96x10^-38
Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't U-E a constant, so you can bring it outside the integral ?
 
That's what I did. Still gave me the same answer
 
Can't see it being done. Not telepathic and not clearvoyant. Show what you do, so we can discuss it...
 
I showed you exactly what I did. The first calculation under "3. The Attempt at a Solution". I put 0.03keV for U-E and I entered it exactly like that into my calculator. I told you the answer I got and the answer I'm looking for. Not sure how I can be any more specific.
 
T(E)≈exp((-2/1.973keVA/c)√(2(511keV/c))∫(0.003keV)dx)=(0.907)^x

It should look like 0.96x10^-38
 
sorry I get exp(-.097x)
 
bobby.pdx said:
T(E)≈exp((-2/1.973keVA/c)√(2(511keV/c))∫(0.003keV)dx)=(0.907)^x

Did you drop a square root somewhere? Compare what you wrote here with your original expression in the "Relevant Equations" section.

Note, you wrote the units of the mass of the electron as kev/c. Is this correct?
 
I made a mistake in that calculation. The answer I got from that equation is actually exp(-.097x) which is still not correct. Also I meant to write the unit of mass as keV/c^2
 
  • #10
I don't get .097. Again, did you drop a square root? I see a square root symbol occurring twice in

T(E)≈exp((-2/hbar)√(2m)∫√(U(x)-E)dx)
 
  • #11
Oh you're completely right. Now I got (.169)^x. Now if I change 5nm to 50A I get (.169)^50=.287x10^-38. This is a way better answer even though it's not the same it's at least the same order of magnitude.
 
  • #12
That's close to what I get, too. I get Exp[-1.77x] = Exp[-88.5] = .37x10-38
 
Last edited:
  • #13
cool. thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top