Approximating Alternating Series w/ 0.0000001 Accuracy: 4 Terms Needed

AI Thread Summary
To approximate the alternating series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\) with an accuracy of 0.0000001, four terms are necessary. The fourth term, \(\frac{(0.3)^6}{6!}\), evaluates to 0.000001, which is greater than the target accuracy, while the fifth term is significantly smaller. The remainder of the series can be estimated by the absolute value of the next term being dropped, which in this case is the fifth term. Therefore, the first term that can be omitted to stay within the desired accuracy is the fifth term, confirming that four terms are required for the approximation. This understanding clarifies the reasoning behind the book's conclusion.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n = 1 - \frac {(0.3)^2}{2!} + \frac {(0.3)^4}{4!} - \frac {(0.3)^6}{6!} + \frac {(0.3)^8}{8!} - ...

how many terms do you have to go for your approximation (your partial sum) to be within 0.0000001 from the convergent value of that series?


the answer to this question is 4, but i don't know how the book got 4. Probably a real easy question, but I am really confuse since there are no examples i can find, so can someone help? i really don't even know where to start, but i found this:

|s-s_n| \leq |s_n+1 - s_n| = b_n +1

any help will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ProBasket said:
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n = 1 - \frac {(0.3)^2}{2!} + \frac {(0.3)^4}{4!} - \frac {(0.3)^6}{6!} + \frac {(0.3)^8}{8!} - ...

how many terms do you have to go for your approximation (your partial sum) to be within 0.0000001 from the convergent value of that series?


the answer to this question is 4, but i don't know how the book got 4. Probably a real easy question, but I am really confuse since there are no examples i can find, so can someone help? i really don't even know where to start, but i found this:

|s-s_n| \leq |s_n+1 - s_n| = b_n +1

any help will be appreciated

Calculate the values of each of the terms and note the progression of the sizes of them. Isn't that inequality supposed to be

|s-s_n| \leq |s_{n+1} - s_n| = b_{n +1}

It is saying that the absolute value of the remainder after n terms will be no greater than the absolute value of the difference between the sum to n + 1 terms and the sum to n terms. Another way of saying that is look at the next term.

http://www.mathwords.com/a/alternating_series_remainder.htm

For an alternating series, you only have to look at the magnitude of the first term you are dropping from the sum to estimate the remainder.
 
OlderDan said:
Calculate the values of each of the terms and note the progression of the sizes of them.

well the 4th term is \frac{(0.3)^6}/{6!} but it comes out to .000001


and the 5th term has 8 zeros, so the 4th term is closer to the value 0.0000001. so is that how the book got 4th term as an answer?
 
The question is asking to find n such that:

s - s_n < 10^{-7}

Once youve found the first n, there's no need to go further.
 
ProBasket said:
well the 4th term is \frac{(0.3)^6}/{6!} but it comes out to .000001


and the 5th term has 8 zeros, so the 4th term is closer to the value 0.0000001. so is that how the book got 4th term as an answer?

It is not a question of being closer. It is a question of greater than or lesser than. The fourth term is ten times bigger than the permitted remainder, so you have to keep it. You would have to keep it even if its value were .00000010000. . .000001. The first term you can leave out is the first term that is smaller than .00000001. That is the fifth term. That is how the book got the answer.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top