Arches or Beams: Why Arches Hold More Weight on Pasta Bridges

  • Thread starter Thread starter jadoreparis30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams
AI Thread Summary
Pasta bridges designed with arches or triangular peaks can support more weight than flat beam structures due to their ability to distribute stresses more effectively. The arch shape is recognized as one of the strongest natural forms, allowing for better load management. Triangular arrangements also approximate this strength by providing stability and rigidity. The discussion highlights the importance of structural design in weight-bearing capacity. Further insights from an engineer are anticipated to deepen the understanding of these principles.
jadoreparis30
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why do pasta bridges made with arches or triangular peaks hold more weight than those made with a flat beam? Assume the weight is attached to the base or deck of the bridge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An arch is inherently the strongest structure in nature, and a triangular arrangement is a reasonable approximation thereof. It has to do with how stresses are distributed. An engineer should be along shortly to give you more information.
 
That does make sense. Thank you for the input!
 
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...
Back
Top