- #36
WWGD
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 7,248
- 10,998
i') Not a non-seq. You can always fall on the : yes, regulations ( or just-about anything you want) are bad, but they are necessary in an imperfect world.mheslep said:Chopped the first clause because i) the 2nd is a non-sequitor to the 1st, ii) DEvens already responded to the fallacy, iii) I didn't claim here anything about Friedman's academic career.
.
ii') I never accepted it is a fallacy. By that same token, no one has to be held to anything, since they can always claim that their views hold only under certain assumptions/conditions, but not in this imperfect world. I believe one should not kill. But only in an ideal world where certain things happen.
My bad, I confuse