Are Proportional Sides Enough to Prove Equal Angles in Similar Triangles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
Proportional sides in triangles indicate that the triangles are similar, which means their corresponding angles are equal. In the context of a parallelogram, proving that segments BX and DY are parallel involves demonstrating that corresponding angles are equal. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding geometry concepts, especially before tests. The clarification about similar triangles reinforces the relationship between side proportions and angle equality. Overall, proportional sides are sufficient to prove equal angles in similar triangles.
dekoi
Oddly enough, i forget my geometry laws two days before the test.

If ABCD is a parallelogram where x and y are on the midpoints of AD and BC. Prove that BX and DY are parallel. I understand one would have to prove that corresponding angles are equal. thus, AHX would equal CMY, and ADM would equal BHC.

My question is: if a large triangle and a smaller triangle have proportional sides (e.g. 1/2), would the angles be proven equal?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey, you're not supposed to forget until AFTER the test!


Yes, if two triangles have sides in proportion, then they are "similar" triangles and have the same angles.
 
Thank you HallsofIvy for reminding me about the similar triangles, as well as to forget everything i know after the test. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top