Are Skew-Symmetric Matrices a Subspace of Mat2x2(ℝ)?

mang733
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was able to show that the set of all 2x2 "symmetric" matrices is a subspace of Mat2x2(lR) using the 3 axioms. However, I wasn't able to do the same with skew-symmetric (A^T=-A). anyone can help? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's reason you can't! If A is the matrix with entries [0 1] and [-1 0] it is skew symmetric. What is A2?
 
Subspace, Halls, squaring it doesn't matter.

0^t=0=-0

If A^t =-A, then (kA)^t = -kA, for k a scalar

(A+B)^t = A^t+B^t, so if they're skew symmetric then this is -A-B = -(A+B)

so where did you proof go wrong?
 
the kernel of any linear map is a subspace.

consider the map taking A to (A + A^t). for symetric ones consider A goes to (A-A^t).
 
thanks for the help guys.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top