Are Speed, Acceleration, and Velocity the Same?

AI Thread Summary
Speed, acceleration, and velocity are distinct concepts in physics. Speed is a scalar quantity defined solely by magnitude, while velocity is a vector that includes both magnitude and direction. Acceleration refers to the change in velocity, which can occur through changes in either magnitude or direction. For example, traveling at 100 km/h represents speed, whereas 100 km/h east defines velocity, and actions like turning or braking illustrate acceleration. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping basic physics principles.
gatorgirl
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Is speed, acceleration and velocity the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Gatorgirl.
Just to jump-start it: speed is a scalar measurement, which is defined only by its magnitude; velocity is a vector measurement, which is defined by both magnitude and direction; acceleration is a change of velocity, so it applies if either the magnitude or the direction is altered.
In everyday terms, speed would be something like 100 km/h; velocity would be 100 km/h east; acceleration would be taking a corner or hitting the brakes or gas pedal (brakes would be a negative acceleration, but still an acceleration).
 
Thanks. The website is helpful in explaining it on a very basic level. My textbook is written by UF and it provides few examples.
 
Thank You :)
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top