Are There Recent Findings on Earth-Sized Exoplanets and Instrument Limitations?

AI Thread Summary
Recent findings indicate that Earth-sized exoplanets are challenging to detect due to significant instrument limitations, with NASA's Kepler mission being a notable effort in this area. There is a growing interest in the number of Earth-type planets in the galaxy, but specific studies are needed for more detailed insights. Additionally, while databases like the IAU Minor Planet Center provide extensive information on planetoids, they often lack mass data because mass determination typically requires additional proxies rather than being directly inferred from orbital parameters. The discussion highlights the need for improved detection methods and data collection to advance understanding of exoplanets. Continued research and technological advancements are essential for uncovering more about these distant worlds.
madman143
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone could indicate me towards recent(and respectable) findings over the number of Earth type planets in the galaxy. examples of exoplanet studies and the like would be great. thanks a lot.
And also findings on the number of exoplanets surrounding stars would be most appreciated.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Earth sized planets are very difficult to detect, largely due to instrument limitations. NASA's Kepler mission is the most recent entry into this field:
http://kepler.nasa.gov/
 
Chronos said:
Earth sized planets are very difficult to detect, largely due to instrument limitations. NASA's Kepler mission is the most recent entry into this field:
http://kepler.nasa.gov/

On a similar note, I am looking for a list of planetoids, and I am interested in their masses. I found a comprehensive databases at http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/MPLists.html
(at IAU Minor Planet Center). All these databases, contain orbital parameters, magnitudes etc...but apparently no masses.?? is it because mass cannot be determined from the orbit, so one has to use proxies?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top