Are Z21 and C2*C6 Isomorphic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter razorg425
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the group of units of Z21 is isomorphic to C2*C6. Initial attempts to demonstrate this through multiplicative tables reveal discrepancies, prompting a request for further guidance. It is suggested to first establish that Z21 is isomorphic to Z3 × Z7, leveraging the fact that GCD(3,7) equals 1. Participants discuss the need to show that every element in Z3 × Z7 can be expressed in a specific form, hinting at the application of the Chinese Remainder Theorem for assistance. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in proving cyclicity and the importance of understanding group structures.
razorg425
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys just a quick question on how I would go about showing the units of Z21 is isomorphic toC2*C6(cyclic groups).I have done out the multiplicative table but they seem to be different to me. What else can I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by proving that \mathbb{Z}_{21} \simeq \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_7. What are the groups of units of \mathbb{Z}_3 and \mathbb{Z}_7?

(Hint: it's important that GCD(3,7)=1.)
 
Sorry Rochfor,
I actually can't prove that, I know it should be true as gcd(3,7)=1.
A little more help please?
Thanks.
 
Try proving that the group on the right is cyclic.
 
Jeez i can't even do that.
Im having a terrible day with this.
 
So we want to show that every element of \mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_7 is of the form n \cdot ( [1]_3, [1]_7 ). So for x, y \in \mathbb{Z}, we want ( [x]_3, [y]_7 ) = n \cdot ( [1]_3, [1]_7 ) = ( [n]_3, [n]_7 ). So we need to find a number n so that x \equiv n \mod 3 and y \equiv n \mod 7. The http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html" is your friend.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
523
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
847
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K