ATLAS reanalysis of W mass: Lower uncertainty, agrees with SM

In summary, the recent ATLAS result on the W boson has been improved with better analysis methods and new results from elsewhere. The primary difference is improvements in the event generation, particularly in obtaining the mass of W. As time passes, some of the models and inputs used for this measurement become outdated and are replaced with newer ones. This is a complex process that requires a lot of tuning and adjustment. Pythia, a commonly used event generator, may not be accurate enough for this measurement.
  • #1
37,274
14,119
TL;DR Summary
ATLAS reduced the systematic uncertainties of its measurement. This puts the CDF measurement in even stronger disagreement with other experiments.
Improved ATLAS result weighs in on the W boson
Same dataset, but better analysis methods and some new results from elsewhere that could be used. Money plot from ATLAS:

ATLAS-Plot_Overview_WMass%20%281%29.png


This makes the CDF measurement an even weirder outlier than it was at the time of publication.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, ohwilleke, malawi_glenn and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The primary difference is improvements in the event generation. It makes one wonder if there are similar improvements to be made at Tevatron energies.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
The primary difference is improvements in the event generation
What are the improvements?
 
  • #4
Without getting too technical, what you want is m(W). What you have is m(l + v) and you're missing the z-component of the neutrino. It takes some modeling to get from one to the other and those models contain inputs like proton structure.

As time passes, some of these models (or inputs) are disfavored by the data and new ones are created to take their place.
 
  • Like
Likes the_experimentalist, mfb and vanhees71
  • #5
I have used pythia a lot.

Is it just the event generation of W -> l + v that has been improved or what else have they done?

If you have any technical references, I would be happy to read them
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #6
Pythia (at leas Pythia 6 out of the box) won't come close. The PDFs are ancient, the underlying event isn't right, and it won't get radiation of the lepton right.

This is kind of a part in 10,000 measurement. Takes lots of tuning and adjustment to get everything right.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #7
Yeah I have also used Pythia with various pdfs. I guess I have to look more into the newest version of PHOTOS
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
49
Views
10K
Back
Top