Averaging the cube of semimajor axis to position ratio wrt to time

  • #1
antythingyani
5
2
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Summary:: Averaging (a power of) semimajor axis to position ratio wrt to time - celestial mechanics

I evaluated it this far, but i don't know how to change the dt to d theta ... the final solution is

Sideways equation 01.jpg

supposedly (1-e^2)^-(3/2) . Any help will be appreciated.photo1638096644.jpeg

[Image re-inserted with correct orientation by Mentor]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not very easy to read your post or to understand precisely what question you are asking.
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
It's not very easy to read your post or to understand precisely what question you are asking.
The question is basically : derive the average of (a/r)^3 taking time as an independent variable. (where a is the semi major axis and r is the distance in an elliptical keplerian orbit.
 
  • #4
antythingyani said:
The question is basically : derive the average of (a/r)^3 taking time as an independent variable. (where a is the semi major axis and r is the distance in an elliptical keplerian orbit.
Given that we cannot easily express ##r## as a function of time, what is your strategy?
 
  • #5
we can express r as a function of semimajor axis (a) and the true anomaly (theta). In that case maybe finding a way to turn dt into dtheta would be handy... or trying to express theta as a function of t.
 
  • #6
antythingyani said:
we can express r as a function of semimajor axis (a) and the true anomaly (theta). In that case maybe finding a way to turn dt into dtheta would be handy... or trying to express theta as a function of t.
I don't think you can get ##\theta## as a function of ##t## either. We have: $$\frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{L}{mr^2}$$But I don't know that solves the problem. There might be some trick using Kepler's law.
 
  • #7
... we also have $$\frac{a(1 - e^2)}{r} = 1 + e\cos \theta$$ Perhaps that does the trick?
 
  • #8
... which it does.
 
  • Like
Likes antythingyani
  • #9
PeroK said:
... which it does.
The 1-e^2 terms cancel and then again we will be left with a/r isn't it?!?
 
  • #10
antythingyani said:
The 1-e^2 terms cancel and then again we will be left with a/r isn't it?!?
I'm not sure what you mean by that. I used my notes on the derivation of elliptical orbits to find the relevant equations. This looks like a tricky problem where you'll need to do the same. I've given you the two equations to get you started.

At this level, I think you need to learn a little Latex:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

If you reply to my posts you'll see what I've typed to render the mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Back
Top