Bases of Generalized Eigenvectors

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

So I'm a bit confused about finding a basis of generalized eigenvectors for an operator that is not diagonalizable. I have some "steps" in mind, but maybe someone can help me out here:

1) Find the eigenvalues of the matrix/operator
2) Find the eigenspaces corresponding to each eigenvector; for those which do not have a "big enough" basis, we must compute the generalized eigenspace for that eigenvalue
3) Here's where I'm confused! I know that the generalized eigenspace is given by kernel((T-λI)^p) for some positive integer p, and that (T-λI)^(p-1) is an eigenvector of T. I guess I'm lost with calculating this nullspace.

Are we literally taking the matrix (T-λI) and raising it to the power p? Because it doesn't seem to work on any problems I've attempted so far... anyone know? :eek:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show us first a small example of an operator that is not diagonalizable.
Take then the opportunity to illustrate the steps 1 and 2.
Then we can discuss maybe step 3.
 
I recommend you do what lalbatross suggests- looking at a specific simple example might help you see what is happening.

You first find the lowest integer p such that (T-λI)^p has the entire eigenspace of \lamba as kernel. But I don't understand what you mean by "(T-λI)^(p-1) is an eigenvector of T". (T-λI)^(p-1) isn't a vector, it is a linear transformation. Did you mean to apply it to something?
 
I wonder if there is any online document available to show us how to compute all the generalized eigenvectors?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top