Bearing Basics: Axial, Radial, & Tangential Loads

  • Thread starter Thread starter sriram123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Bearing
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the differences between axial, radial, and tangential loads on bearings is crucial in machine design. Axial loads apply along the axis of the bearing, while radial loads act perpendicular to it, and tangential loads create shear stress. The construction of bearings varies to accommodate these loads; for instance, thrust bearings have wider grooves to handle axial loads, whereas radial bearings are designed primarily for radial loads. Proper clearance is essential to maintain an oil film and prevent catastrophic failure due to metal-to-metal contact. Overall, the design of a bearing directly influences its ability to support specific types of loads effectively.
sriram123
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I have recently started my machine design course in engineering and I am finding the topic of bearings difficult to follow.
I understand the need for bearing.What I cannot understand is what axial,radial and tangential loads will try to do with the bearing (especially the tangential load).

Can anyone provide some references to illustrate the loads and their effect on bearings?

Sorry if something is confusing.I just want some graphical description for bearings.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
what kind of bearing? crankshaft, tapered, roller, needle, ball?
 
First of all thanks for the replies.

I just wanted to understand a simple system with say deep groove ball bearings.I went through some references and now i think i have some of my questions answered.

What I don't understand still is how do radial and thrust bearings differ construction wise.How is a bearing specifically constructed to take more axial or radial load.

Thanks in advance
 
a thrust bearing is designed with wide grooves in it and a radial bearing usually only has a groove in the block side of the bearing except an olds 455, that I know of. the groove towards the block is to help oil flow across the bearing rather than just having a hole in it. where as on a rod bearing the hole is in the crankshaft and the bearing is spinning on the crank that such will oil the whole bearing. but on a main the groove helps spread the oil out. and as far as bearings on a crankshaft go the clearance is more important to keep the oil film as the ''bearing material'' because if you had any metal to metal contact. you have catastrophic failure in this instance. and if you have for instance an axle bearing that doesn't have a c clip that carries a side load. it will be tapered to help it carry a load. where as if you use a c clip you don't need the taper because the load is to the c clip and carrier pin. what application are you talking about using these bearings in. and maybe I could give you less automotive specific advice
 
Here's a cross-section of a pure radial-load bearing.

%D0%B0%20%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC%20%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%86%D0%B5.png


Imagine that there's a shaft going through it's center, and imagine a radial load on the top race. The load would go straight through the roller and into the shaft...and thus it would be well supported.

Radial.png


Now imagine trying to ask this bearing to withstand a thrust load on its top race. there's nothing supporting the load. In fact, the bearing would simply fall apart.

Thrust.png



You have to rotate the rollers 90 degrees to turn this into a thrust bearing. Of course, then it would take no radial load. You can also rotate the rollers maybe 45 degrees, so it can take a bit of both loads...



s-c-h-s-thr.jpg


If you examine other types of bearings...ball, fluid, whatever, you will see from their layout that they are simply weaker for one type of load than the other, or in some (most?) cases will simply fall apart if asked to take a load they are not designed for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top