Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.

In summary, the conversation revolved around an individual's passion for collecting and restoring old devices, particularly electrical components from the early 1900s. They shared photos of their collection, which included vintage bulbs, switches, and transformers, and discussed the craftsmanship and attention to detail of these items. The conversation also touched on the nostalgia and sentimental value of preserving and working with old technology. The individual credited their interest in old devices to a scrap collector who allowed them to explore his collection as a child.
  • #561
dlgoff said:
Here's something you don't see much these days:

View attachment 294048
View attachment 294049

I wish I had a machine to use it with.
Boy, that brings back some memories. I only had a small reel-to-reel (3 1/2" reels?) - this would be late 60's early 70's. But I recall getting hold of some of those old 7" reels, I think some were archived local radio shows, and putting them on my smaller reels.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #562
My friend converted all his albums and others he could find to reel to reel tape so he could get free of the record player.
 
  • #563
I have one of these that I backed up data on but I don't have the device to read it. :oldeyes:

ZipDisk.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and jedishrfu
  • #565
Borg said:
I have one of these that I backed up data on but I don't have the device to read it. :oldeyes:

View attachment 294067
I have the device to read those. I'd have to look around in my junk boxes to find it though. If I do find it, I'll let you know. I don't really need it anymore.
 
  • #566
dlgoff said:
I wish I had a machine to use it with.
Lots of them on eBay.
 
  • #567
DaveE said:
Lots of them on eBay.
Thanks. I'll do some looking.
 
  • #568
dlgoff said:
I have the device to read those. I'd have to look around in my junk boxes to find it though. If I do find it, I'll let you know. I don't really need it anymore.
No problem. I'm sure there isn't anything important on it. It's just funny how data storage has changed in the last 20 years.
 
  • #569
Borg said:
No problem. I'm sure there isn't anything important on it. It's just funny how data storage has changed in the last 20 years.
Okay then. Let me know if you would like it sometime in the future.
 
  • #571
About 25 years ago I gave an old RCA meter to a friend who likes to do electronics work ##-## he just sent me a link to a video regarding his rebalancing of the meter:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Tom.G and jedishrfu
  • #572
I have that same RCA VTVM. A minor quirk is that the "D" size flashlight battery used for Ohms measurement MUST be a Carbon-Zinc cell. The slightly lower open circuit voltage of an Alkaline cell is just low enough that the you can not Zero the Ohms scale.

As mentioned in the video at 19:30, electrical calibration and zeroing should always be done with the meter laying on its back. (I wondered when he was going to get to that.) That way the balancing has no effect on the reading.

Then the balancing is done with no power applied and checking that the needle does not move off of zero regardless of meter orientation.

With the meter on its back, adjust the mechanical zero for a Zero reading.
Then position the meter with the face vertical.
Start with the main counterbalance weight that is in-line with the needle. Adjust (move) the main counterbalance weight to get a Zero reading.

If there are existing compensating weights (mounted at right angles to the needle), they are usually 'close enough.' Check them by rotating the meter in the same plane with the face vertical (that is: rotate the meter in the plane that the needle moves; about 6:30 in the video).

If the compensating weights do need adjusting, be aware that they interact with each other and with the main counterbalance weight. Ideally the two compensating weights should be the same weight in the same position on their arms.

If the Zero shifts by different amounts depending on which side edge the meter is on (the direction may be the same or different), adjust each of the two compensating weights by HALF the amount needed to cancel the movement.

When done, re-check that the meter is still Zeroed when on its back.

And if you want to be really paranoid, check the electrical calibration with the meter lying down on its back and with the face vertical. If the linearity changes, probably the two compensating weights are slightly mis-adjusted or the meter needle or one of the weight arms is bent.

Have Fun!

p.s. the above was learned the hard way after fighting about four attempts on various meter movements!

p.p.s. be sure there are no metal filings or drill chips in the area. They are almost impossible to remove from the meter innards without damage.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, hutchphd and sysprog
  • #574
Here's an old TV that I had put away:

TV-1.jpg

TV-2.jpg

edit: It's diagonal screen width is 12 inches.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and jedishrfu
  • #575
Not old enough, it must be a B&W to qualify for retirement.
 
  • Like
Likes Oldman too and hutchphd
  • #576
jedishrfu said:
Not old enough, it must be a B&W to qualify for retirement.
I think you're right. When I turn it on, I get a noisy B&W raster. I haven't tried it with my regular TV's outside antenna yet. I'll do that when I get a chance. Too many other things going on right now.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
  • #577
dlgoff said:
I think you're right. When I turn it on, I get a noisy B&W raster. I haven't tried it with my regular TV's outside antenna yet. I'll do that when I get a chance. Too many other things going on right now.

I'm guessing it won't do much good, if connected directly to the antenna. I don't think TV stations still broadcast in analog anymore, in the middle of the US.
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/dtv-and-over-air-viewers-along-us-borders

You could still test it in conjunction with VCR, DVD player, DTV converter, or cable box that has the appropriate connectors though. Just don't expect it to receive a signal directly through the air anymore. Not without some sort of digital TV converter box.
 
  • Informative
Likes dlgoff
  • #578
collinsmark said:
I'm guessing it won't do much good, if connected directly to the antenna. I don't think TV stations still broadcast in analog anymore, in the middle of the US.
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/dtv-and-over-air-viewers-along-us-borders

You could still test it in conjunction with VCR, DVD player, DTV converter, or cable box that has the appropriate connectors though. Just don't expect it to receive a signal directly through the air anymore. Not without some sort of digital TV converter box.
I'll look into that. But it's probably more trouble than it's worth. I'll just keep the thing and not worry about it.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #579
You can always do a Second City comedy skit with it. I remember their opening credits where TVs were thrown out the windows of an apartment building.

 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and collinsmark
  • #581
dlgoff said:
... it's probably more trouble than it's worth. I'll just keep the thing and not worry about it.
Maybe you can find a Betamax to pair with it.
 
  • Haha
Likes anorlunda and DaveE
  • #582
gmax137 said:
Maybe you can find a Betamax to pair with it.
I have a friend that use to have one, but he's probably gotten rid of it by now.
 
  • #583
How about a sony camcorder? I remember they had cables to connect to old tvs. Alternatively, an old game console would be cool too like an Atari 2600 or vintage Nintendo.
 
  • #584
jedishrfu said:
How about a sony camcorder? I remember they had cables to connect to old tvs. Alternatively, an old game console would be cool too like an Atari 2600 or vintage Nintendo.
I don't have access to either. I'm just going to hang on to it and not try to make it work.
 
  • #585
Okay. Enough of that old TV. Here are a couple photos of something that's electrical and measures:
counters-3.jpg

counters-2.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Janus
  • #586
dlgoff said:
Okay. Enough of that old TV. Here are a couple photos of something that's electrical and measures:
That could be a prop from any 50s SF movie. A Geiger counter. Every movie scanned the monsters using one of those.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #587
Nice, Gieger Counter. Have you noticed any temporary shrinking on anyone tested with it?

A lead-in to a funny story: While an undergrad student of physics, I and my classmates overheard our instructor answer a call from a frantic mother. She was concerned that her son was shrinking after exposure to a Gieger Counter as school. Our prof told her not to worry that it was a temporary effect that would go away in a week.

We couldn't contain our laughter upon hearing his response. After the call, he said she would never have responded well if he had said you're imagining it so instead he allayed her fears by telling her it was temporary. We learned a great lesson in compassion that day.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto, Baluncore and dlgoff
  • #588
I may have posted this Ludlum counter before. It works better than the others as I have a Radium check test sample that I've used:
counters-4.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
  • #589
dlgoff said:
Okay. Enough of that old TV. Here are a couple photos of something that's electrical and measures:
View attachment 303908
View attachment 303907
I've actually used one of these, on myself.
20+ yrs ago, I was diagnosed with a renal carcinoma. They sent me to get a bone scan just to make sure it hadn't metastasized. This involves being injected with a radioisotope tracer, and then they scan you looking for "hot spots" that would indicate something unusual. (they only detected the aforementioned tumor.)
The technician who gave me the injection mentioned that I would be "radioactive" for a day or so.
My place of employment at the time was not too far from a nuclear power plant, and so we had a Gieger counter just like this in our emergency supplies. So, of course, the next day when I was back at work, I had to test it out. I switched it on, held it out, and got click...click...click. I brought it in and ran it over my body. When I got to the area of the effected kidney, I started getting click..click..click..click.
 
  • Love
Likes dlgoff
  • #590
dlgoff said:
Okay. Enough of that old TV. Here are a couple photos of something that's electrical and measures:
View attachment 303908
View attachment 303907
Do those still work? I'd like to get one, maybe an ebay search is in order...
 
  • #591
gmax137 said:
Do those still work? I'd like to get one, maybe an ebay search is in order...
I just put a battery in one and checked it out on this old x-ray tube:
x-ray.jpg

and it didn't work. But the Ludlum counter worked just fine.
 
  • #592
Janus said:
So, of course, the next day when I was back at work, I had to test it out. I switched it on, held it out, and got click...click...click. I brought it in and ran it over my body. When I got to the area of the effected kidney, I started getting click..click..click..click.
You missed a golden opportunity to play a play a practical joke on your fellow workers there... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Oldman too and dlgoff
  • #594
I have the first HP desk calculator with a CRT and delay line for memory. It has this interesting feature; the keyboard mechanically locks up while it is doing a calculation. Odd that this was easier done mechanically than with electronics. I'm away so will picture some stuff later.
 
  • Wow
Likes DaveE and berkeman
  • #595
Opera said:
I have the first HP desk calculator with a CRT and delay line for memory. It has this interesting feature; the keyboard mechanically locks up while it is doing a calculation. Odd that this was easier done mechanically than with electronics. I'm away so will picture some stuff later.
Wowie, what is the HP model number?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top