Beginner question about special relativity

neginf
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Saw this in a book last night. I hope I read it right and am remembering it right.

If two rectangular coordinate systems share the same x-axis and one is moving at a constant speed towards positive x and a beam of light is traveling along their x axes going towards the positive, then at the beam is at x=ct and x'=ct', one for each system.

The book says then x-ct=M(x'-ct') for some constant M.
What I don't get is doesn't x-ct=0=x'-ct' mean M is 1?

What am I not understanding about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't add a variable to one side of an equation without adding it to both sides. A variable can end up being something other than one later on so that is why it is not done.
 
neginf said:
Saw this in a book last night. I hope I read it right and am remembering it right.

If two rectangular coordinate systems share the same x-axis and one is moving at a constant speed towards positive x and a beam of light is traveling along their x axes going towards the positive, then at the beam is at x=ct and x'=ct', one for each system.

The book says then x-ct=M(x'-ct') for some constant M.
What I don't get is doesn't x-ct=0=x'-ct' mean M is 1?

What am I not understanding about this?
Why do you limit the solution to M=1?

M can be any value and the equation is still true, isn't it?

0 = M(0) is true for any value of M, correct?
 
Thank you both. x-ct=x'-ct'=0 so x-ct=anything*(x'-ct').
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top