Best Acceleration (Ergonomically)

  • Thread starter Thread starter robinfisichel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an acceleration curve for a lightweight electric car, aiming for a 0-60 mph time of 9-10 seconds and a top speed of around 100 mph. Participants agree that initial acceleration should be strong but will naturally decrease as speed increases, primarily limited by traction and power. There's skepticism about the relevance of the 0-60 mph metric, with suggestions that real-world performance should be measured from 30/40 to 70 mph instead. Throttle mapping is highlighted as crucial for optimizing acceleration, emphasizing the need for a smooth delivery without unexpected spikes. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of balancing performance characteristics with practical driving experiences.
robinfisichel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Im trying to spec the acceleration curve (vs time) for a car i am designing in a project. The car is lightweight (400 kilos) low drag (cd=0.15) and electric (also only one forward gear).

Im trying to come up with what would 'feel' like a good acceleration.
0-60mph is about 9-10 seconds.
Top speed around 100mph

Would most people agree that the 'kick' or greatest acceleration should happen in the first few seconds and then progressively decrease up to the max speed?

If anyone has some accel data logs from a slowish passenger car (both electric and non electric) that would be useful...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
apologies if I've misunderstood this... but if you already know what the 0-60mph time is, don't you already have a accn curve?
 
Seems like a pointless excerise to me.

More acceleration = better...

Fact is you won't be able to alter 'when' the kick comes in as that determined by the engine, gearing, mass and traction available. Basically no matter what you do, the inital acceleration is likely to be traction limited, then as you get going it'll be power limited.

No matter what you do the biggest 'push' will come at peak torque in gear. There is very little you can do to alter that.

AS an asside 0-60 is a totally pointless measure of real world performance, simply becuase no one does it. 30/40 - 70 is a fer better target to aim for. (Basically acceleration from normal speed to motorway speeds)
 
xxChrisxx said:
Seems like a pointless excerise to me.

More acceleration = better...

Fact is you won't be able to alter 'when' the kick comes in as that determined by the engine, gearing, mass and traction available. Basically no matter what you do, the inital acceleration is likely to be traction limited, then as you get going it'll be power limited.

No matter what you do the biggest 'push' will come at peak torque in gear. There is very little you can do to alter that.

AS an asside 0-60 is a totally pointless measure of real world performance, simply becuase no one does it. 30/40 - 70 is a fer better target to aim for. (Basically acceleration from normal speed to motorway speeds)

actually i think i have confused myself, my question is probably more to do with throttle mapping, more acceleration = better only if you are putting your pedal to the floor (i.e. want the max performance) though you would want that acceleration early on (you don't want some sort of huge spike at 50mph as its not really expected).
 
More acceleration is ALWAYS better :)

I must agree with xxChrisxx's aside about the 0-60. While it does tell you something about the car because in general, a better 0-60 means better 30-70, this is not always the case. I've actually seen manufacturers deliberately decrease the overall performance of their cars, simply because it resulted in a better 0-60 time...and that defeats the very point of the measurement.
 
robinfisichel said:
actually i think i have confused myself, my question is probably more to do with throttle mapping, more acceleration = better only if you are putting your pedal to the floor (i.e. want the max performance) though you would want that acceleration early on (you don't want some sort of huge spike at 50mph as its not really expected).

There's no way you would ever get a 'spike' of acceleration. As acceleration is determined by the torque output of the engine, so unless you had a very large spike in the torque speak you wouldn't get a large sudden rush of acceleration.

In general with cars as opposed to thinking strictly in terms of speeds, it's better to just think in terms of engine revs and gear ratios.

eg. you say you don't want a huge spike at 50mph. You may do, if I put my foot down in 3rd i'd expect some performance. however if I was in top gear, I wouldn't expect to accelerate at all. In the 3rd gear case, you'd be running between peak torque and peak power. In top gear you'd be at low revs.

For thottle mapping you generally want it mapped against load and speed, to be honest my mate is the one to talk to on this as ECU's are just magic little boxes to me.

However in general, at low load and WOT you want lots and lots of fuel being injected (read slightly rich). As that generally signifies that you are traveling slowly and want to get a move on. At high load (speed) and WOT, you want to lean the engine out for good fuel economy. Ie motorway cruising at peak efficiency.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Back
Top