Betz Limit Applied to hydro turbine?

AI Thread Summary
The Betz limit, which applies to wind turbines, does not directly apply to hydro turbines due to their different operational principles. Hydro turbines utilize gravitational potential energy from falling water, allowing them to achieve efficiencies exceeding 85%, unlike the 60% limit for wind turbines. The discussion highlights that certain systems, like those with a significant elevation drop or specialized designs such as venturi systems, can exceed traditional efficiency expectations. The Ludington Pumped Storage Power Plant exemplifies high efficiency in hydro systems, achieving around 80% round trip efficiency. Overall, hydro turbines operate under different physical principles, allowing for greater energy conversion efficiencies.
rmm5
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just wondering if the Betz limit is applicable to hydro turbines or if there is some analogous limit for hydro turbines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This article claims that water turbines can exceed the Betz limit (for windmills) with the proper venturi.
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Direc...Technical_Report_on_Davidson-Hill_turbine.pdf
I can also see that a penstock with a large elevation drop will also exceed the Betz limit (about 60% for HAWT wind turbines). As a matter of fact, the pumped water storage system at Ludington, Michigan has about a 80% round trip efficiency. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludington_Pumped_Storage_Power_Plant
Bob S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Betz limit commonly applies to wind turbines and to underwater turbines which are made to turn by the bulk movement of water (e.g. tidal power). This theoretical efficiency limit is around 60%, where at most 60% of the wind (or water) kinetic energy is converted to mechanical energy in the rotor.

Hydro turbines are different, in that they use gravitational potential energy of falling water to turn turbines. The physics is different in that the water is channeled into the turbine, but for a wind turbine you have the blades spinning in open air, or in the case of an underwater turbine, open water. This is why hydro turbines (in particular Francis turbines), can reach higher efficiencies, more than 85%.

That's the word explanation. I'm sure there's a more rigorous mathematical way of proving it, but off the top of my head I don't know of one.


rmm5 said:
Just wondering if the Betz limit is applicable to hydro turbines or if there is some analogous limit for hydro turbines?
 
Thanks for the info.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top