Billiard ball gas and extensive entropy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the thermodynamic properties of a gas composed of distinguishable billiard balls, particularly in relation to entropy. Despite the balls being distinguishable by serial numbers, their thermodynamic behavior aligns with that of indistinguishable particles when measured through standard thermodynamic methods. At equilibrium, the gas exhibits a Maxwellian velocity distribution, allowing for typical thermodynamic measurements like pressure and temperature. The key conclusion is that the entropy of this gas will be extensive, as the measurement methods do not account for the distinguishability of the particles. Overall, the findings affirm that thermodynamic indistinguishability leads to extensive entropy, regardless of the particles' unique identifiers.
Rap
Messages
827
Reaction score
10
I am reading Arieh Ben-Naim's book "A Farewell to Entropy", trying to understand "indistinguishable particles".

What if you have a gas composed of billiard balls and their collisions are perfectly elastic with each other and with the walls of their continer. Each ball has a unique serial number marked on it, but these marks do not change the collision physics. You can read the numbers, but the process of reading them does not appreciably affect the trajectory or collision processes.

Now at equilibrium the balls will have a Maxwellian velocity distribution. You can make all the usual thermodynamic measurements on this gas - you measure pressure as the average force on a large area, the temperature will be 2E/3k where E is the average energy per ball and k is Boltzmann's constant. Will the thermodynamics of this gas be qualitatively different than that of a container of say, hydrogen gas? In particular, if you measure the entropy (or entropy change) of this gas by thermodynamic methods, will it be extensive? I mean, the particles are distinguishable, and its always said that this means the entropy is not extensive.

I think that the answer is yes, the entropy will be extensive. Since "thermodynamic measurements" does not include shining a beam of light on individual balls, and since you cannot read the serial number by thermodynamic methods, the balls are "thermodynamically indistinguishable" and the entropy will be extensive. Does this sound right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, this is exactly right!
 
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top