Bohr Quantization with linear potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the energy levels of a particle in a linear potential using Bohr's quantization rule. The integral for momentum, which is essential for the calculation, initially does not converge, prompting a reevaluation of the limits based on turning points where the potential becomes imaginary. The symmetry of the potential allows for simplification by eliminating the absolute value and calculating the integral from zero to the turning point. Ultimately, the derived energy levels are expressed as a function of the potential strength and quantum number. The final energy expression is confirmed, with a suggestion to correctly position the potential constant within the formula.
andre220
Messages
75
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Using Bohr's quantization rule find the energy levels for a particle in the potential: $$U(x) = \alpha\left|x\right|, \alpha > 0.$$

Homework Equations


##\oint p\, dx = 2\pi\hbar (n + \frac{1}{2})##

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so:
##\begin{eqnarray}
\oint p\, dx &= \int \sqrt{2m(E-U(x))}\,dx\\
&= \int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \sqrt{2m(E-\alpha\left|x\right|)}\,dx\\
&= 2\pi\hbar (n+\frac{1}{2}
\end{eqnarray}##
So far, I believe this is correct, but the integral doesn't converge so either I am missing something or I've done something wrong. I can't seem to see what it is. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a turning point where the square-root becomes imaginary, that's your upper limit...
 
Right I see, so I get the two turning points at $$\pm \sqrt{\frac{E^2}{\alpha^2}}$$ and now its just a matter of evalutating the integral.
 
Yes, and the integral is easy to carry out.
Also, note that it is symmetric about 0 so you can dispose of the absolute value and take twice the integral from 0 to the turning point.
 
Thank you for your help. Got an answer of $$E_n = \alpha\left(\frac{3}{2}\frac{\pi\hbar}{\sqrt{2m}}(n+\frac{1}{2})\right)^{2/3}.$$ which seems okay.
 
No problem... But i think you want to put this α inside the parenthesis ;)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top