Brain fade/idiot moment - simple question about pipe flows

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the placement of a butterfly valve in a pipe system involving a fan and various pipe configurations. It is noted that the positioning of the valve—either upstream or downstream of the fan—can affect system performance, particularly in terms of backpressure control. A common practice among process engineers is to place the valve downstream to manage backpressure effectively. The original poster seeks clarity on the expected outcomes of different configurations before investing time in a more complex 3D model. Ultimately, the correct placement depends on the specific operational goals of the fan within the system.
alpha754293
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Stupid question:

I have the following pipe configuration:

Working fluid = ambient air

Pipe1 = 6 inch ID x 24 inch length
Expansion1 = 2 inch length
Pipe2 = 8 inch ID x 2 inch length
Fan1 = assume 200 CFM @ 2860 rpm, 0.05 inH2O
Contraction1 = 2 inch length
Pipe3 = 6 inch ID x 12 inch length
Butterfly valve, 50% open
Pipe4 = 6 inch ID x 12 inch length

Question:

Does it matter whether the butterfly valve is downstream of the fan or upstream of the fan?

(e.g. Pipe1 --> Expansion1 --> Pipe2 --> Fan1 --> Contraction1 --> Pipe3 --> Butterfly valve --> Pipe4

Or

Pipe1 --> Butterfly valve --> Expansion1 --> Pipe2 --> Fan1 --> Contraction1 --> Pipe3 --> Pipe4)

Discuss/prove your work/answer please.

(I tried modelling it with a 1D pipe flow program and I don't know if I am doing it right. And before I go and spend a significantly longer amount of time building the 3D model, I would like to know what the expected value should be for a problem like this. Thanks.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
alpha754293 said:
Discuss/prove your work/answer please.
This looks like schoolwork. Should I move it to the schoolwork forums for you?
 
berkeman said:
This looks like schoolwork. Should I move it to the schoolwork forums for you?

It looks like it's schoolwork, but it actually isn't.

It's professional work.

(Background: I'm doing CFD with turbomachinery and we are having some problems with the test results so I wanted to quickly model it with 1D pipe flow program and failed to do so, and I wanted to see if there was a way to quickly come up with the answer before I go spending a lot of time building the 3D CFD model to test for the same thing.)

Thanks.

Like I said - idiot/brain fade.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
It is impossible to give a 'correct' answer without knowing what the purpose of the fan is in the context of the wider system. That said, from my experience (process engineer) it is far more common to control rotating equipment such as fans with backpressure (i.e. valve downstream) rather than on the suction side.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Back
Top