BRST Symmetry and unphysical polarizations

  • Thread starter Thread starter lornstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
lornstone
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading the BRST Symmetry section of Peskin and Schroeder but I can't find anywhere
why the BRST transformation for the gauge vector,
\delta A_\mu^a = \varepsilon \partial_\mu c^a
implies that only forward polarized states can create ghosts by applying Q, Q being define by
\delta \phi = \varepsilon Q \phi
I saw in a paper that it's obvious when we go to momentum space, but unfortunately it's not for me...

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid I can't help, but one point about your post confuses me- why have you taken the D^{ab} from Peskin and Schroeder's treatment to be diagonal? Isn't it the covariant derivative in the adjoint of the gauge group?
 
Yes it is. But Peskin is considering the limit case where g is equal to zero
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top