Bubble rising underwater. What is the time taken for it to reach the surface?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time taken for a gas bubble to rise from a depth H underwater to the surface, considering the bubble's initial volume V0 and mass M. The key equations referenced include Archimedes' Principle and the ideal gas law, which highlight the relationship between buoyant force and the bubble's weight. The original attempt to derive the time involved a complex second-order differential equation, which the poster found challenging to solve. Suggestions included simplifying the approach by expressing the forces acting on the bubble and using calculus to establish a relationship between acceleration and depth. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for atmospheric pressure and buoyancy in the calculations.
Nanyang
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The initial volume and depth of the gas bubble is V0 and H respectively. The bubble has a mass M and the gas can be assumed to be ideal. The gravitational field strength is a constant g. And the density of water is Dw.

What then, is the time taken for a bubble initially at rest at a depth H underwater rise to the surface? Assuming that there is no resistive force on the bubble and the temperature is constant during the rise. Try to avoid the presence of an atmosphere above the water surface, however if needed then take the atmospheric pressure at the water surface be Patm.

Homework Equations


F = ma
Hydrostatic Pressure = height x density of liquid x g
Archimedes' Principle
Ideal gas law

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding the net force from the buoyant force and the weight of the bubble with the aid of Archimedes. But since when the bubble rises the pressure of its surroundings decreases and its volume should rise. So the buoyant force is not constant. I use the ideal gas law to find the volume in terms of H, V0 and h(t). Where h(t) is the depth at some time t. After some work I arrived at:
d2h/dt2 + [V0HDwg/M](1/h) -g = 0

The plan was to find h(t) then equate it to 0 and solve for t which will give the time for it to rise to the surface. But it is so complicated that I believe I must have made a mistake somewhere. So I am here to seek help. :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nanyang said:
… After some work I arrived at:
d2h/dt2 + [V0HDwg/M](1/h) -g = 0

The plan was to find h(t) then equate it to 0 and solve for t which will give the time for it to rise to the surface. But it is so complicated that I believe I must have made a mistake somewhere. So I am here to seek help. :wink:

Hi Nanyang! :smile:

I can't check your equation without seeing your full calculations, but if it's right, then the standard way of solving it would be to write dh/dt = v, and then substitute d2h/dt2 = dv/dt = dv/dh dh/dt = v dv/dh :wink:
 
Hi! Thanks for that tip though I still can't solve it as I'm a rookie. :redface:

These are the steps I took:

Using Archimedes and Newton,

F = m a = DwVg - mg

a = DwVg/m -g

Then using P1V1=P2V2 and P=hDwg,

V= V0H/h

Substituting this into a, and since a= d2(H-h)/dt2...

d2h/dt2 + [V0HDwg/M](1/h) -g = 0

Which I believe to have a big mistake somewhere. But never mind my attempt, what would be another (even easier) way to find the time taken for the bubble to rise up?
 
Nanyang said:
Then using P1V1=P2V2 and P=hDwg,

V= V0H/h

P isn't just equal to rho*gh; it's equal to rho*gh+p_atm, so V=V0H/h doesn't hold. (If it did, V would be infinite at the surface.)
 
Is it necessary to include P_atm to solve the problem? Can someone give a clue to find the time?:redface:
 
Last edited:
I think there is more than one problem in that derivation.

Consider this; the downward forces on the bubble is the bubbles weight, the upward force is the buoyancy of the bubble.

So you will then have;
ma = buoyancy -mg (bubble)

ma = rho(water)*V(gas)*g - m(gas)*g
This would be my starting point. You can express the mass in terms of P, V, R, T and molecular mass of air ~28g.

Some terms should cancel and a relationship between a and h should be possible and with a bit of calculus a relationship with time should be possible. It will still include h but I hope this works. Is this a viable method? I think it has if it legitimate to cancel the volume terms.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top