Business student who likes science

AI Thread Summary
A 21-year-old nearing graduation with degrees in Accounting and Finance is reconsidering their career path, expressing a desire to pursue science, particularly physics or astrophysics, despite not wanting to switch majors at this late stage. They acknowledge a lack of certainty about their interest in the details of physics, preferring a big-picture perspective. Suggestions include exploring a single physics course to gauge interest and considering roles that bridge business and science, such as becoming an actuary or supporting scientists with funding and marketing. The discussion highlights the importance of business skills in scientific fields, emphasizing that scientists need support in areas like finance and management. Ultimately, the individual seeks to find a way to engage with science while leveraging their business background.
anonchi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Im 21 and should be graduating in December with a BS in Accounting and BS in Finance. Now that I'm actually close to graduating, I'm beginning to think more about life after college. One thing I've realized is that I don't like business. Sure I could go through with it and be successful, but I'd rather do what I love, and that's science. I haven't narrowed it down too much, but I think I'd like to do physics or astrophysics. Who knows, maybe I'll end up changing my mind about the specific field I'd like to go into, but either way, I'm definitely going down the wrong path. Since I'm so close to graduating, I'm not going to switch majors suddenly and waste four years of time and tuition. How would I go about getting into science with a BS in business? Do I need a BS in science to do a Masters in science? If I need a BS, can I take the main classes (calculus, physics, etc.) without all the extra general studies that goes with a degree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stick with business. you don't know if you like physics or not. physicists and engineers need businessmen to market their ideas and products in a market economy, and beg for funding in a command economy. businessmen never go out of business.

the biggest obstacle to big science is funding. you can make it happen and help science far more than if you actually studied science.
 
You're right when you say i don't know if I like physics or not. I watch a lot of science documentaries and I love learning about the way the world works. The thing is - I don't know if I'd be interested in the details. I am a big picture kind of person. While learning about the cosmos is interesting to me, I don't think I'd be interested in the minute, insignificant details.

I'd like to be involved in science in some way though. Any suggestions?
 
Hey anonchi and welcome to the forums.

If you are interested in learning some more statistics and a bit more other math, becoming an actuary might be up your alley.
 
You can always appreciate science in the way that you already are. If you want to get your toes wet, maybe take 1 course in physics and see how you like it?
 
anonchi said:
You're right when you say i don't know if I like physics or not. I watch a lot of science documentaries and I love learning about the way the world works. The thing is - I don't know if I'd be interested in the details. I am a big picture kind of person. While learning about the cosmos is interesting to me, I don't think I'd be interested in the minute, insignificant details.

I'd like to be involved in science in some way though. Any suggestions?

like i said, scientists and engineers need people to help them sell their products/beg for funding. then they need people to help them manage their finances. that's where businessmen and accountants come in - you.

here's what I'm going to say about the "not interested in details" - I've been reading some astrophysics papers recently. I'm totally untrained in this field, but i can tell that it is nothing , NOTHING like the science documentaries. its seriously more like accounting than you think it is.
 
Hello Physics Forums Community, I'm hoping to draw upon the community's collective wisdom regarding a procedural challenge that I believe many independent researchers face. I'm working on a self-contained theoretical framework from a foundational starting point. The work touches upon concepts from general relativity, quantum foundations, and cosmology, attempting to connect them based on a single relational principle. It has now reached a point, where some parameter free values seemingly...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
21K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top