Calculate Acceleration of Falling Hammer on Moon | 1-D Kinematics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter RubenL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
An astronaut drops a hammer on the Moon, which falls 6.0 meters in 2.7 seconds, leading to a calculated acceleration of 1.62 m/s² using the kinematics equation x = x0 + v0t + (1/2)at². The discussion focuses on understanding the origin of the 1/2 in the equation, which comes from calculus and the integration of motion equations. The derivation involves separating variables and integrating, resulting in the term (1/2)at², which accounts for the changing velocity during the object's fall. Participants emphasize the importance of calculus for grasping the underlying principles of kinematics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
RubenL
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An astronaut standing on a platform on the Moon
drops a hammer. If the hammer falls 6.0 meters vertically in 2.7 seconds, what is its acceleration?

Homework Equations



x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2

The Attempt at a Solution



x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2
6=0+.5(a)(2.72)
6=3.7a
a=1.62m/s2

This is a very simple question and easily solvable...however my question is...considering this kinematics equation x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2.
I can understand how all of the variables play within this equation, but i do not understand where the 1/2 comes from (i understand it has to be this way, however), what is the purpose of halving you answer?

(this is wrong, but) why can't the equation be solved like so;

X=6m
Vi=0m/s
t=2.7s
a=?m/s2

6m / 2.7s = 2.2m/s
2.2m/s / 2.7s = .81m/s2

and leave it like so? (like i said i know this is wrong, but i am just trying to figure out why the 1/2 is in the equation)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im not very good at typing in the formulas. But the 1/2 comes from the derivation of the expression you are using, and the properties of calculus.

x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

is derived from v=dx/dt, separate the dx and dt (v*dt=dx) and integrate both sides. You can subsitute v for (vo +at), since you velocity at any time is equal to your initial velocity + your accel*time.

so you now are integrating both sides of dx = (vo +at)dt. When you integrate the second term on the right "a*t", a is constant, so you can pull it out of the integral, then integrate t*dt, which is 1/2*t2. the first term on the right side integrates to vo*t

this whole integral gives you x=vot +1/2at2 +C

When t=0, you find C=xo

so the final expression you are using is x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

hopefully that helps
 
Last edited:
climb515c said:
Im not very good at typing in the formulas. But the 1/2 comes from the derivation of the expression you are using, and the properties of calculus.

x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

is derived from v=dx/dt, separate the dx and dt (v*dt=dx) and integrate both sides. You can subsitute v for (vo +at), since you velocity at any time is equal to your initial velocity + your accel*time.

so you now are integrating both sides of dx = (vo +at)dt. When you integrate the second term on the right "a*t", a is constant, so you can pull it out of the integral, then integrate t*dt, which is 1/2*t2. the first term on the right side integrates to vo*t

this whole integral gives you x=vot +1/2at2 +C

When t=0, you find C=xo

so the final expression you are using is x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

hopefully that helps

Great! This helps put reason to it. I see i need to get my head into calculus to fully understand. But its clear to me now that there is a mathematical reason behind it.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top