Calculate Balloon Volume from Helium Mass: 199 kg

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the volume of a balloon filled with 199 kg of helium, the user seeks a formula that does not require the balloon's radius. They note that each cubic foot of helium can lift 0.069 lbs, prompting a conversion of 199 kg to pounds for further calculations. The user considers dividing the weight in pounds by 0.069 to find the volume but is unsure about the accuracy of this method. Additionally, they mention a density of helium at 0.179, suggesting a potential calculation involving this density. The discussion revolves around finding the correct approach to determine the balloon's volume based on the mass of helium.
40856
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The total mass of helium in a balloon is 199 kg. What is the volume of the balloon? Enter only the numeric portion of the answer, not the units.

That is the problem. I am having trouble locating a simple forumla for this. All I can seem to find involve having the radius of the balloon which I do not have. In the book it says each cubic foot of helium can lift .069 lb, so this may play a factor but I am unsure of how exactly. I have thought about converting 199KG to lbs and dividing by .069. Is this thinking correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helium = 0.179 so maybe I can take 199kg times .179 and that 35.621 kg is this correct?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating the Maximum Height of a Helium Balloon
Replies
5
Views
6K
How can I calculate the lift of a helium balloon?
Replies
3
Views
7K
What helium mass in a balloon to make it bouyant in air?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Calculating Ascension Rate of a Helium Balloon
Replies
8
Views
4K
Fill Balloons Homework: Max # People for Bday Party Balloon
Replies
4
Views
5K
How Does Density Affect the Lifting Power of Helium Balloons?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Moles of gas helium balloon; buoyancy; PV=nRT
Replies
3
Views
8K
How Large Must a Helium Balloon Be to Achieve Neutral Buoyancy?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Is it possible for human powered hot air balloon?
Replies
24
Views
8K
Pressure of Helium inside a balloon floating in air
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top