Calculate Force for Beam Shear Failure

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force necessary for shear failure in a 1/2" tall tooth made of 303 stainless steel with a cross-sectional area of 0.125", the shear stress equation (Force/Area) can be applied. The failure was attributed to repetitive stress rather than a blunt force, with the component operating at approximately -5C. The fracture surface exhibited both crystalline and dull characteristics, indicating a mix of brittle and ductile failure modes. It is important to note that gear tooth forces are complex, and stress concentrations can significantly affect the results. A coarse failure load can be estimated by multiplying the shear strength of the material by the area, but this will only provide an upper bound for the actual forces involved.
Hockeyguy2026
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I started a new job two weeks ago and I've been out of school for twenty years and have not used strength of materials knowlegde since. I had a part fail in the lab and I would like to calculate the force that would have been necessary to cause the shear failure. I have simplified the problem to a 1/2" tall tooth with a cross section area of .125". The material is 303 stainless steel. Can anyone help me with the equation to find this force. I understand that the part failure was caused by repeative stress and not a blunt force but my first step is to find that blunt force value.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What temperature was the component running at at failure?
 
The temperature was below freezing - approx. -5C. The failed compent was from an ice maker.
 
OK so standard quoted materials properties would apply.

Shear stress = Force/area

So you can calculate a coarse failure load by multiplying the shear stength of your steel by the 1/8 sq inch.

However the forces on gear teeth are much more complex so this will only give you an upper bound. There are significant stress concentrations depending upon the shape of the teeth.

Also, what did the fracture surface look like? Can you describe it?
Was it crystalline and shiny or dull and smooth? or was it part crystalline and part dull?
 
The failure looks part crystalline and part dull. The part that broke off is a stream divider that changes the flow of ice from an evaporator to a nozzle that pushes the ice through a tube. The part failed after many months of 24/7 operation.
 
The crystalline part is brittle failure, the dull part ductile failure.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top