Calculate N for Thermo Lab Vacuum at 293K

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of gas molecules per cubic centimeter in a vacuum at 293K with a pressure of 1.00 x 10-18 atm, the Ideal Gas Law (PV = NkT) is used. It's important to ensure consistent unit conversions, particularly from cubic centimeters to cubic meters, which involves multiplying by the appropriate conversion factor. The discussion emphasizes using SI units, where pressure is expressed in Pascals and the Boltzmann constant is applied correctly. The equation can be rearranged to express the number of molecules per cubic centimeter by adjusting the volume unit accordingly. Overall, the conversation clarifies the application of the Ideal Gas Law and the importance of unit consistency in calculations.
kopinator
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
The best laboratory vacuum has a pressure of about 1.00 x 10-18 atm, or 1.01 x 10-13 Pa. How
many gas molecules are there per cubic centimeter in such a vacuum at 293K?

PV = nkT
P/kT = n/V = N (# of molecules per cm^3)

Since V is typically in units of m^3 or liters, should I make my volume .01V to account for the cm^3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kopinator said:
The best laboratory vacuum has a pressure of about 1.00 x 10-18 atm, or 1.01 x 10-13 Pa. How
many gas molecules are there per cubic centimeter in such a vacuum at 293K?

PV = nkT
P/kT = n/V = N (# of molecules per cm^3)

Since V is typically in units of m^3 or liters, should I make my volume .01V to account for the cm^3?

When making unit conversions, use the trick of multiplying by "1" to help you do the unit conversion.

So to convert from cm^3 to m^3 multiply by "1" like this:

1cm^3 * \frac{(1m)^3}{(100cm)^3}

The cm^3 unit terms in the numerator and denominator cancel (just like numbers cancel if they are identical in the numerator and denominator of a fraction), and you are left with what in units of m^3? Hint -- It's not 0.01 ... :smile:
 
You are using the right equation. People are conditioned to see n as number of moles and N as number of molecules, so better use N.

Now try to work in a consistent set of units. SI units is what every reasonable person would use.
p in Pascal, Pa with 1Pa = 1 N/m[sup2[/sup]. Conversion: 1 atm = 101325 N/m[sup2[/sup].
k Boltzmann constant, J/K 1.3806488 10-23 J/K
T 293 K

The equation gives you n/V in molecules/m3.
Since the exercise asks for molecules/cm3, all you have to do is multiply by

( molecules/cm3 ) / (molecules/m3 ) = cm3 / m3 = (cm / m3) = (10-2)3

[I see berkeman beat me to it, well, good for you!

But I don't agree with him (/her?): pV = NkT is just fine. It's the same as pV = nRT since n = N/NA and R = kB*NA ]
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok, sweet. Thank you!
 
Great post BvU. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top