Calculate Temperature of reservoir from microstate probabilities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the temperature of a reservoir from the probabilities of microstates in a system of 1006 non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in a magnetic field. The user successfully computed the probabilities for the microstates and the average energy of the system but encountered difficulties in determining the temperature using the ratio of probabilities for different microstates. They initially misapplied the probability equations, leading to confusion about the cancellation of terms. After clarification from another participant, the user realized their mistake and successfully resolved the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of careful application of statistical mechanics principles in calculating thermodynamic properties.
opaka
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a network of N = 1006 non-interacting spin 1/2 particles fixed to the sites of a 1D lattice. The network is placed in an external uniform magnetic field so that its total (fixed) energy is given by E = -(N up- N down)ε = -100ε where ε is a positive constant describing how the magnetic moment of each particle couples to the external magnetic field. Now divide the network into a very large component ("the reservoir") and a very small one ("the system"), with the system containing 6 spins and the reservoir containing the remaining 1000.

a. compute the probability of finding the system in each of its allowed 64 microstates
b. compute the average energy of the system
c. use the fact that the probability of finding the system in each of its allowed microstates is given by Pa = exp (-βEa)/Z where Z is a normalization constant to compute the temperature of the reservoir in units of ε. The simplest way of doing this is to take the ratio of the probabilities of two microstates (i.e. the one having all spins up and the one having all spins down).


Homework Equations


the probability of finding a microstate for a given energy Pa = ga exp(-βEa)/Z
the partition function Za = Ʃa ga exp(-βEa)
average energy U= partial derivative with respect to β of ln Za

The Attempt at a Solution


No problem with part a, I just used N!/(N-n)!n! to find the degeneracies of each microstate - for all spin up and all spin down that would be 1, and E = ±6ε
And while messy, part b was straightforward, since Za would be summing up the 7 individual microstates Z and then taking the partial derivative.
c is where I get stuck: I use P(6 up)/P(6 down) = exp(-β6ε)/exp(β6ε). Unfortunately, too much cancels out, and I end up with neither ε or temperature. Any ideas where I'm approaching this incorrectly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okay, so I found this in another stat mech book:
"the ratio of the probability of being in state i to that of being the ground state (E=0) is
pi/p0 = exp(-βEi) and we can then find the temperature of the heat bath to be T= (-E)/(k ln (pi/p0)."

So now my question is, can I justify all spins up or all spins down as a ground state? I would think that 3 spins up and 3 spins down would be the ground state.
 
opaka said:
c is where I get stuck: I use P(6 up)/P(6 down) = exp(-β6ε)/exp(β6ε). Unfortunately, too much cancels out, and I end up with neither ε or temperature. Any ideas where I'm approaching this incorrectly.

Nothing cancels out from this calculation. Take another look: the signs of the exponents are different in the numerator and denominator. Or did you mean something cancels out in a step that you didn't show?
 
Never mind, I must have been sleep deprived or something. I was trying to plug in the probability equations on both sides of the ratio. I figured it out now.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top