Calculate the Coefficient of Friction for a Frozen Turkey

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrs. drake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the coefficient of friction for a frozen turkey weighing 7.2 kg being dragged at a constant velocity of 2 m/s with a horizontal force of 5.3 N, the force of friction must equal the applied force due to Newton's first law. The normal force is equal to the weight of the turkey, which is calculated by multiplying its mass by the acceleration due to gravity. The coefficient of friction can then be determined using the formula μ = F_friction / F_normal. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between force, mass, and motion without providing direct answers, focusing instead on guiding through the calculations. This approach highlights the importance of grasping the underlying physics principles involved.
mrs. drake
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was dragging my frozen 7.2kg turkey due north through the snow at a constant velocity of 2m/s while exerting a horizontal force of only 5.3N. What was the coefficient of friction between the frozen turkey and the snow?

don't you use the formula " FF=ufn" u=coefficient
then mk=ff/fn ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mrs. drake said:
I was dragging my frozen 7.2kg turkey due north through the snow at a constant velocity of 2m/s while exerting a horizontal force of only 5.3N. What was the coefficient of friction between the frozen turkey and the snow?

don't you use the formula " FF=ufn" u=coefficient
then mk=ff/fn ?
Yes, m'am, that you do, but what, pray tell, is the force of friction in this example? (It is not often that I know the gender of posters or responders, so I am assuming from your name that you are of the female variety. If not, my apologies for respectfully referring to you as 'madam' :biggrin:
 
PhanthomJay said:
Yes, m'am, that you do, but what, pray tell, is the force of friction in this example? (It is not often that I know the gender of posters or responders, so I am assuming from your name that you are of the female variety. If not, my apologies for respectfully referring to you as 'madam' :biggrin:

so

fn= 7.2kg
ff= ?

and yes i am a girl:)
 
OK, Mrs. Drake , Newton's first law of motion tells us that if a frozen turkey is moving at constant velocity, there must be no net unbalanced force acting on that bird. So if you're dragging the darn thing forward with a horizontal force of 5.3 N on a level surface, the friction force must be acting backwards with a friction force of _ :confused:?___ N ? But, wait, there's more: The mass of the turkey is 7.2 kg...It's normal force is it's weight, not its mass, where its weight is equal to ___:confused:?____ N.?

(I am assuming this is a homework problem, so I don't want to supply the answers).:wink:
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top