MHB Calculate Volume & Surface Area of a Cylinder Without Lid

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the volume and surface area of a cylinder without a lid, the formulas used are different from those for a closed cylinder. The volume is determined using the formula V = πr²h, where r is the radius and h is the height. For the surface area, the formula is A = πr(h + r), accounting for the curved surface and the base only. There was confusion regarding the need for an image to visualize the cylinder, as some participants noted that no image was posted. Clear communication of the shape is essential for accurate calculations.
Abdullah Qureshi
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
how to find volume and surface area of this without using the upper lid
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Of what ?
 
kaliprasad said:
Of what ?
how to calculate
 
Abdullah Qureshi said:
how to calculate

did you post an image? if you tried, it's not showing up.
 
Are we expected to use our imagination to come up with a shape to find the surface area and volume of?

1628327707615.png
 

Attachments

  • 1628327708854.png
    1628327708854.png
    292.8 KB · Views: 127
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top