Calculating Acceleration of Block on Inclined Plane with Applied Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a block sliding down an inclined plane with given variables, including an applied force and friction. The equations of motion are set up correctly, with the normal force influenced by both the block's weight and the applied force. There is clarification that the mass in the denominator does not drop out because the applied force is independent of mass, unlike the normal force, which is proportional to it. Participants emphasize that the acceleration will change significantly with varying mass due to the applied force's constant value. Overall, the calculations and reasoning presented are validated, confirming the approach is sound.
siderealtime
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A block slides down an inclined plane, here are the variables:

theta of incline = 37 degrees
mass of block = 10 kg
coefficient of kinetic friction = .500
applied force on block perpendicular to plane = 20N

\sum x = mgsin(theta) - fk = ma

\sum y = (20N + mgcos(theta)) - n = 0


n = 20N + mgcos(theta) = 98.3N
fk = \mu*n

I need to find acceleration of the block. Here is how I'm currently doing
it and I would like to know if this is correct.

solving for a in the first equation gives
a = mgsin(theta) - \muk*n / m

What I'm wondering is if the mass in the denominator is supposed to drop out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi siderealtime! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and a sigma: ∑ and a degree: ° :wink:)

yes, that looks fine :smile:

(and the m won't drop out, because the 20N in this case isn't proportional to m)
 
Your normal force will certainly depend on mass, so it should cancel out.
 
Ugh, which is it, these both seem to make sense. Would anyone care to elaborate on how the division by m would go away or not?
 
hi siderealtime! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

xerxes is thinking of the usual normal force, which is proportional to m

but this 20N is an applied force, perhaps from something like a jet, whose value does not depend on m

(it would be different if say there was a 20N weight on top of the mass, which would contribute to the RHS of F = ma, but even then of course the weight would be vertical and not normal, so the proportions still wouldn't be preserved)

making m very large, for example, would make the 20N insignificant by comparison, and would considerably alter the acceleration :wink:
 
Thank you very much, Tim.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top