MHB Calculating Acceleration on the Surface of Venus

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration due to gravity on Venus, the mass of Venus is determined to be 4.86×10^24 kg, which is 81.5% of Earth's mass, and its radius is 6.05×10^6 m, representing 94.9% of Earth's radius. The formula for gravity on Venus is derived as g' = GM_V/R_V^2, leading to the conclusion that g' can be expressed in relation to Earth's gravity. Using Earth's gravity value of 9.81 m/s², the final calculation yields an acceleration of approximately 8.87 m/s² on Venus. Additionally, a rock weighing 75.0 N on Earth would weigh about 62.5 N on Venus due to the difference in gravitational acceleration.
SantiagoHill
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Friends, hello everyone!
Please help with this calculation.

The mass of Venus is 81.5% that of the earth, and its radius is 94.9% that of the earth.
(a) Compute the acceleration due to gravity on the surface of Venus from these data.
(b) If a rock weighs 75.0 N on earth, what would it weigh at the surface of Venuse?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
SantiagoHill said:
Friends, hello everyone!
Please help with this calculation.

The mass of Venus is 81.5% that of the earth, and its radius is 94.9% that of the earth.
(a) Compute the acceleration due to gravity on the surface of Venus from these data.
(b) If a rock weighs 75.0 N on earth, what would it weigh at the surface of Venuse?
a) You probably already have a formula for g' (the acceleration due to gravity) but here is the derivation anyway:
[math]F = \dfrac{GMm}{R^2} = m g'[/math]

[math]g' = \dfrac{GM}{R^2}[/math]

So if the mass of Venus is [math]M = 0.815 M_E[/math] and [math]R = 0.949 R_E[/math] then what is g'?

b) On Earth w = mg. So find m. On Venus w' = mg'...

-Dan
 
a) The mass of Venus MV represent 81.5% of the of the Earth. So, the mass of Venus is
MV=(81.5%)ME
(1)
Where ME is the mass of the Earth. Plug the mass of Earth into equation (1), so we can get MV by
MV=(0.815)ME=(0.815)(5.97×1024kg)=4.86×1024kg
The radius of Venus represent 94.9% of the radius of the Earth. So, the radius of Venus is
RV=(94.9%)RE
(2)
Where RE is the radius of the Earth. Plug the radius of Earth into equation (2), so we can get RV by
RV=(0.949)(6.38×106m)=6.05×106m
The weight w of a body is the total gravitational force exerted on it by all other bodies in the univerce where this gravitational force F is given by Newton`s general law of gravity by
F=GMVmRV2
(3)
Where RV is the radius of Venus, m is the mass of the body. As we mentioned above, this gravitational force equals the weight of the body which is mg, so using equation (3) we get the acceleration on Venus by
mg=GMVmRV2
gv=GMVRV2
(4)
Now, we plug values for RV, MV and G into equation (4) to get gv
gv=GMVRV2
=(6.67×10−11N⋅m2÷kg2)(4.86×1024kg)(6.05×106m)2
 
WestleyColeman said:
a) The mass of Venus MV represent 81.5% of the of the Earth. So, the mass of Venus is
MV=(81.5%)ME
(1)
Where ME is the mass of the Earth. Plug the mass of Earth into equation (1), so we can get MV by
MV=(0.815)ME=(0.815)(5.97×1024kg)=4.86×1024kg
The radius of Venus represent 94.9% of the radius of the Earth. So, the radius of Venus is
RV=(94.9%)RE
(2)
Where RE is the radius of the Earth. Plug the radius of Earth into equation (2), so we can get RV by
RV=(0.949)(6.38×106m)=6.05×106m
The weight w of a body is the total gravitational force exerted on it by all other bodies in the univerce where this gravitational force F is given by Newton`s general law of gravity by
F=GMVmRV2
(3)
Where RV is the radius of Venus, m is the mass of the body. As we mentioned above, this gravitational force equals the weight of the body which is mg, so using equation (3) we get the acceleration on Venus by
mg=GMVmRV2
gv=GMVRV2
(4)
Now, we plug values for RV, MV and G into equation (4) to get gv
gv=GMVRV2
=(6.67×10−11N⋅m2÷kg2)(4.86×1024kg)(6.05×106m)2
You are missing some division operators but otherwise correct.

Here's a bit of a shortcut.

Define [math]g' = \dfrac{GM_V}{R_V^2}[/math] and [math]g = \dfrac{GM_E}{R_E^2}[/math]. We know that [math]M_V = 0.815 M_E[/math] and [math]R_V = 0.949 R_E[/math]. Then
[math]g' = \dfrac{GM_V}{R_V^2} = \dfrac{G (0.815 M_E)}{(0.949 R_E)^2} = \dfrac{0.815}{0.949^2} \dfrac{G M_E}{R_E^2} = \dfrac{0.815}{0.949^2} \cdot g[/math]
and now you can use g = 9.81 m/s^2.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
You are missing some division operators but otherwise correct.

Here's a bit of a shortcut.

Define [math]g' = \dfrac{GM_V}{R_V^2}[/math] and [math]g = \dfrac{GM_E}{R_E^2}[/math]. We know that [math]M_V = 0.815 M_E[/math] and [math]R_V = 0.949 R_E[/math]. Then
[math]g' = \dfrac{GM_V}{R_V^2} = \dfrac{G (0.815 M_E)}{(0.949 R_E)^2} = \dfrac{0.815}{0.949^2} \dfrac{G M_E}{R_E^2} = \dfrac{0.815}{0.949^2} \cdot g[/math]
and now you can use g = 9.81 m/s^2.

In order to get a better and more complete explanation of the solution of this problem, I advise you to go to https://plainmath.net/38641/the-mas...-the-earth-and-its-radius-is-94-9%-that-of-th and read the information here. In addition, you can find other useful information here.

Thanks for the advice.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top