Calculating Average Binding Energy per Nucleon and Decay of Free Neutrons

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average binding energy per nucleon of Magnesium-26, the formula used is Binding E = (Zmp + Nmn - Ma) X 931.494 MeV/u, where Ma refers to the mass of the nucleus, not the atomic weight. For the decay of free neutrons, the characteristic half-life is 10.4 minutes, and the fraction of neutrons decaying over a distance of 12.2 km can be determined using the exponential decay formula N(t) = N * e^{-const*t}. The velocity of the neutrons can be calculated from their kinetic energy, and the time taken to travel the distance can be used to find the decay constant. Special relativity may not be necessary for this calculation due to the low kinetic energy involved.
SteveoFitz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, simple question about binding energy. I'm asked to find the average binding energy per nucleon of Magnesium-26. Now I thought that I would have to use: Binding E = (Zmp + Nmn - Ma) X 931.494 MeV/u. Where Z is the atomic #, N is the # of neutrons, mp, mn, and Ma are mass of proton, mass of neutron, and mass of nucleus respectively. My question is for Ma would that just be the atomic weight of the atom since it's asking for average binding energy?

Actually I got one more on nuclear physics as well. The questions asks: Free neutrons have a characteristic half-life of 10.4 min. What fraction of a group of free neutrons with kinetic energy 0.0414 eV will decay before traveling a distance of 12.2 km? Do not enter unit. I don't know where to start on this one, we're not given a relationship between these quantities so I'm assuming there's something I'm supposed to interpret from this data.

Anyways, hopefully someone can help thanks!
Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the second one, you need to use special relativity. From the energy of the neutron, you can calculate the velocity and thereby the time dilation. Then you just need to figure out how long the neutron takes to travel the 12.2km in its own reference frame.

Edit: Actually, those numbers seem small enough you might not need to use special relativity. If you haven't learned it, don't try to. Just calculate the velocity based on the given kinetic energy.

cookiemonster
 


I'm still having problems on this second one, sure i can get the velocity, and then the time using the 12.2 km. However then how am I supposed to find the fraction of neutrons from this data, I'm still perplexed to say the least.
 
The decay is exponential: If you have N neutrons at t=0, N(t)=N*e^{-const*t}.

Find the constant to get the correct half-life (meaning: after t_{half} there are 50% of the Neutrons left), and then put in the time you found.

I don't think you have to use SRT here, 0.0414eV is not so much
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top