Calculating Basis of Tangent Plane

flyinjoe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I've looked at this topic for a while and I have yet to come to any sort of conclusive answer when it comes to calculating the basis of a surface's tangent vector. Do you have a concrete method or know where I can find one for doing this?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean by "the" basis. Any vector space has an infinite number of bases. If a surface is given by f(x, y, z)= Constant, then the normal vector to the surface is \nabla f so the tangent plane at (x_0, y_0, z_0) is give by \nabla(x_0, y_0, z_0)\cdot <x- x_0, y- y_0, z- z_0>= 0. You can get one vector in that tangent plane by taking y= y_0, x= x_0+ 1 and another, independent vector so they form a basis, by taking x= x_0, y= y_0+ 1.

For example, if the surface is given by x^2yz= 1 then the normal vector at any point is <2xyz, x^2z, x^2y>. At (1, 1, 1) that would be <2, 1, 1>. The tangent plane there is 2(x- 1)+ y- 1+ z- 1= 0 or 2x+ y+ z= 4. if x= 2, y= 1, then 4+ 1+ z= 1 so z= -1. The point (2, 1, -1) is also in that plane so the vector <2- 1, 1- 1, 1-(-1)>= <1, 0, 2> lies in that tangent plane. If x= 1, y= 2, then 2(0)+ 1+ z= 4 so z= 3. The point (1, 2, 3) is also in that tangent plane so the vector <1- 1, 2- 1, 3-(-1)>= <0, 1, 4> lies in that tangent plane. The two vectors <1, 0, 2> and <0, 1, 4> are two independent vectors in thet tangent plane and so form a basis.
 
HallsofIvy, thanks for the response! Sorry my question was sort of ambivalent. By 'the' basis, I meant 'a' basis. That's a very concise and helpful explanation.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top