Calculating Beam Reaction Forces for Wind Turbine Shaft Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter JCJones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating reaction forces for a wind turbine shaft design, specifically addressing how to locate bearings and determine their specifications. The shaft experiences loads from rotor blades and a chain linked to a generator, with two supports in between. The user struggles with the calculations, particularly with the sum of forces and moments, leading to incorrect load distributions at the supports. Suggestions include carefully checking moment directions and distances, as well as drawing the beam for clarity. The user acknowledges the advice and plans to post in the appropriate forum in the future.
JCJones
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a piece of coursework I have to design a shaft for a windturbine.

The shaft has a load on one end due to the rotor blades and a load on the opposite end due to a sprocket which is chain linked to a generator. The supports are bearings in between the two loads, as shown in this drawing:

beam.jpg


A is the force due to the rotor: 343.35N
B is a bearing/support
C is the second bearing/support
D is the force due to the chain: 781.46N

My task at this point is to locate the bearings on the shaft and then specify which bearings to use.

However I can't work out how to calculate the reaction forces at the supports. I've been trying to do it using the usual: sum of forces in y direction=0 and sum of the moments=0 but I keep ending up with one support taking more load than the sum of the y forces and the second support therefore being negative, as if it is another load.

Due to the constraints of a frame the beam has to be attached to, the first support(B) is 60mm from the rotor(A) and the second support(C) is 40mm from the sprocket(D). The shaft is 350mm long.

If anyone can point out where I might be going wrong it would be a massive help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums

Don't know if you got one of the moment directions wrong or forgot to add the moment distances correctly.

Two tips

It helps to draw the beam as I have done.

Taking the moments about one of the unknowns eliminates it.

go well

PS one more tip.

You should post homework/coursework in the appropriate forum.
 

Attachments

  • shaft5.jpg
    shaft5.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 506
Cheers, Yeah I realized I wasn't taking enough care of my directions with the moments.

Thanks for your help.

And I'll be sure to post it there next time!
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...

Similar threads

Back
Top