Calculating Change in Velocity of 600kg Sports Car

AI Thread Summary
A driver of a 600kg sports car, traveling at 40m/s towards a railroad crossing 250m away, applies brakes that exert a friction force of 1200N. Initial calculations led to confusion regarding acceleration, but using the correct force value revealed an acceleration of -2m/s². This allowed for the application of kinematic equations, ultimately determining the car's speed at the crossing to be 24.5m/s. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent force values and proper application of physics principles. The problem was resolved successfully with the correct calculations.
NMW
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
2) the driver of a 600kg sports car, heading directly for a railroad crossing 250m away, applies the brakes i a panic stop. the car is moving at 40m/s, and the brakes can supply a friction force of 1200N. a) how fast is the car moving when it reaches the crossing?

- i tried finding the change in time for this, thinking i could then find displacement from that, but it ended up as 2.5hours!
i then used f=ma and then average acceleration, got acceleration = 8... or neg 8... but then when i worked it out for change in velocity i got that the velocity was increasing, which can't be right seeing as the car is slowing down!?
any help appreciated!

3) a metre-stick is found to balance at the 29.7cm mark when placed on a fulcrum, when a 50g mass is attached at the 10cm mark the fulcrum must be moved to the 39.2 cm mark for balance. what is the mass of the meter stick?

- just plain stuck on this, tried about 3 different ways of attempting the question, but couldn't find one that suited! again, any help appreciated!

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NMW said:
i then used f=ma and then average acceleration, got acceleration = 8... or neg 8...

If you define the positive direction to be the direction of motion, then the acceleration is indeed negative. But it sure isn't -8. Just divide F by m and you get:

a=\frac{F}{m}=\frac{-1200N}{600kg}

You can finish that, right?
 
F = ma is the way to go. You just have to choose which direction is postive and keep everything consistent from there. Once you have F=ma you can integrate to get v and again to get x. This gives you three sets of equations specific to you problem that you can then use to get the answer.
 
thanks

ok, i think i have got this one... i was just using the wrong value for force, which was throwing it all out.. once using -2m/s^2 i put that into the v^2=v(initial)^2 + 2a (x-x(initial) or something along those lines... it then came out as 24.5m/s, which fits with the rest of the calculations in the question!
thanks! :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top