Calculating Effective Nuclear Charge using Ionization Energy

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the effective nuclear charge (Zeff) for sodium using ionization energy, the formula Zeff = Z - S is applied, where Z is the atomic number and S is the shielding constant. An initial calculation yielded S = 8.8, resulting in Zeff = 2.2, but the expected value is 1.8. A different approach involves using the equation E = RH (Zeff / n)², which incorporates ionization potential, though there are concerns about unit consistency. The Rydberg constant should be used in eV for accurate calculations. Understanding the correct application of these equations is essential for determining Zeff effectively.
doublavay
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Find the effective nuclear charge of the outermost electron in sodium using its ionization energy.

Ionization energy of sodium = 5.14 eV = 8.23e-19 J
Zeff = Z - S

I tried using the equation Zeff = Z - S, but when I followed all the rules, I found

S = (8*0.85)+(2*1.00) = 8.8
Zeff = 11 - 8.8 = 2.2

but the answer in my book says that it should be 1.8, and that method didn't use the ionization energy of sodium. I need to find an equation that explains quantitatively how ionization energy relates to Zeff.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums! And sorry for the delay in responding.

Up until the last 10 minutes, I was not familiar with this type of problem. After a google search, I am now familiar with two ways to solve this problem.

One way is the way you did it, but they don't seem to want that. The other way is shown here, look at the equation for Zeff:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=266326

That way does make use of the ionization potential. You'll have to use the appropriate value of n as well, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
I'm still having trouble with this problem, because E = RH (Zeff / n)2 doesn't seem to have units that cancel out. Energy is measured in Joules or eV, but RH is the only thing with units on the other side of the equation, and it has units of m-1. Or maybe I'm using the wrong value of RH... I thought it was just the Rydberg constant multiplied by 1(because it's Hydrogen). Is that incorrect?
 
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
It's good to know that some people still pay attention to units :smile:

RH, with the units of m-1, is 1/λ for ionization of the hydrogen atom. Instead, use the Rydberg constant in eV, which may be found in the Atomic constants section here:

http://www.pnc.aps.anl.gov/info/Physical_constants_1986.html

(This is simply the ionization energy of Hydrogen.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes VSayantan
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top