Calculating electric fields due to continuous charge distributions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the origin due to a linear semicircular rod with a linear charge density. A participant questions the formula used, noting that the denominator should include a² instead of just a, as this affects the units and correctness of the electric field calculation. The integral setup is confirmed to be correct for a semicircular distribution, with clarification on the limits of integration. The importance of unit consistency in physics problems is emphasized, and the participant expresses gratitude for the guidance received. Understanding the derivation of the components, such as the cosθ factor, is acknowledged as well.
al_famky
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
calculating electric fields due to continuous charge distributions?

a question I came across doing some electric field questions, and the answer was really confusing.

Homework Statement


Charge is distributed along a linear semicircular rod with a linear charge density λ as in picture attatched. Calculate the electric field at the origin

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


for the first question, the magnitude of E was calculated with dE=\frac{adθλ}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}a}, but why is there only one "a" in the denominator, not a^{2}? The final result was this equation \int^{\phi}_{-\phi}\frac{λcosθdθ}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}=\frac{λsin\phi}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}} which makes sense only if the "a" was dropped.
Thanks to anyone who'd be willing to explain the answers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you forget to attach the picture? Maybe I'm just stupid and don't know how to find it. I would want to make sure I understand the question correctly. The integral in your "attempt" goes from -\phi to +\phi. That makes me think that the rod is only a semicircle when \phi = \pi / 2. I'm guessing that's why it's called "semicircular" rather than "a semicircle". Is that correct?

Other than that, you're absolutely correct. It should be a^2 in the denominator of dE because otherwise the units are not even correct. As it is, the answer you've quoted has units of charge per unit length, which is the unit of electric potential, not electric field.

Finally, I'm assuming you understand where the factor of cos\theta in the integral comes from since you didn't ask about it specifically.
 
my apologies, I thought i did upload the picture.
But you got the gist of the problem from the without the picture anyways.
Unit check, the fundamental approach to going over problems---why didn't I think of that?
I do understand the cosθ, thanks for asking

Thank you for taking the time to reply!
 

Attachments

  • 捕获.PNG
    捕获.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 553
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top