Calculating Heat Loss for Improved Efficiency in a Steam Generator Design

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on redesigning a steam generator with specific requirements, including a minimum water capacity of 2.25 liters and a heat loss limit of 75W at -3°C. The user seeks guidance on the calculations needed to determine heat loss for improving efficiency, as they lack a physics background. They clarify that the output is 70 grams per hour, equating to about five tablespoons of water vapor, and mention that the device resembles a vaporizer or kettle rather than a traditional steam generator. The current design includes a heating element, insulation, and a fan, but improvements have only been made by adding more insulation. The user is looking for equations or resources to better understand heat loss calculations.
Jt2015
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
At current I am trying to redesign a steam generator as seen in the picture attached, the requirements for this are as follows:
· The water contain must have a minimum capacity of 2.25 litres
· The heat loss as boiling point shall not exceed 75W in ambient of -3 C +/- 1 C
· The fan shall have a capacity of 0.07 to 0.10m^3/min at 0.5 mbar static pressure
· Six steam outlets holes shall be positioned at the top of the generator around the perimeter spaced at equal distances
· The generator should be calibrated at -3 C +/- 1 C to give reading for each 70 +/- 5g/h output up to a maximum of n times this figure where n is the maximum number of seating positions designated by the manufacturer.

Having not studied physics I am struggling to find what calculations would be required in order to calculate the heat loss and therefore cannot try improving it.
The dimensions for the base are not set and can be altered, only the nozzle and dispersion chamber have set dimensions.

If somebody could point me in the right direction to what equations I will need that would be great,

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Steam Pic.png
    Steam Pic.png
    29.7 KB · Views: 600
Engineering news on Phys.org
Jt2015 said:
70 +/- 5g/h output
Grams? Or, gallons?
 
Bystander said:
Grams? Or, gallons?

Sorry, it's grams per hour
 
Here's the requirements for the nozzle and chamber too.
 

Attachments

  • Nozzle & Chamber.png
    Nozzle & Chamber.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 566
Jt2015 said:
Here's the requirements for the nozzle and chamber too.
I don't think this device is a steam generator in the conventional sense, more like a vaporizer or a tea kettle. 70 g an hour is equivalent to converting about 5 tablespoons of water to vapor.
 
SteamKing said:
I don't think this device is a steam generator in the conventional sense, more like a vaporizer or a tea kettle. 70 g an hour is equivalent to converting about 5 tablespoons of water to vapor.

Yeh that's a problem I've had as regards to research into it, there's not much information on them. I've literally called it that because that's what it is listed as in the guidelines.

Effectively it is just a kettle heating element in an aluminium (Previous machine) casing lined with insulator, with the nozzle, chamber and fan on top.
I just have little knowledge on what calculations I need to work out the heat loss through it in order to then improve the efficiency for the design as currently the method for this has been just add more insulator.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top