Calculating Jet Engine Thrust and Power | Rocket Thrust Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mwingboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket Thrust
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the thrust and power of a jet engine based on given parameters, including air intake, fuel burn rate, and exhaust velocity. The user attempts to apply the impulse-momentum principle by calculating initial and final momentum over a one-second timeframe. Initial momentum is derived from the total mass of air and fuel multiplied by the aircraft's velocity, while final momentum accounts for the exhaust gases ejected at a relative speed. The user seeks validation of their approach and any potential flaws in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding momentum changes to determine thrust effectively.
mwingboy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A jet aircraft is traveling at 246 m/s in horizontal flight. The engine takes in air at a rate of 77.0 kg/s and burns fuel at a rate of 4.00 kg/s. If the exhaust gases are ejected at 633 m/s relative to the aircraft, find the thrust of the jet engine and the delivered power.

find thrust and power

ive tried everything! even my teacher couldn't get the problem. but i refuse to just accept that i can't get it..please help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you've tried everything maybe you could show at least some of it.
 
ahh yes, sorry about that.

here's what i know. i know that it change in momentum is obviously is impulse. So i have it set to a 1 second time frame, and i found:

initial momentum = ((77 kg + 4 kg) * 246 m/s) = 19926 kg*m/s
TOTAL MASS * VELOCITY = Momentum

final momentum = ((77 kg + 4 kg) * -387 m/s) = -31347 kg*m/s
TOTAL MASS * VELOCITY = Momentum

the change in that would become the average force because impulse (which is change in momentum) is equal to average force * time. and the time is set to 1 in this instance.

anybody see flaws in the thinking?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top