Calculating Kinetic Energy Uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of an object with a given mass and speed, along with determining the associated uncertainty. The kinetic energy is calculated to be 1.8 J, but participants debate the best method for calculating uncertainty without using derivatives. One suggested approach involves adding uncertainties from mass and velocity in quadrature, while another emphasizes considering extreme values to assess the total uncertainty. The definition of 'uncertainty' is also discussed, highlighting the importance of understanding whether it refers to standard deviation or a simple ± range. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexity of uncertainty calculations in physics and the need for careful consideration of measurement methods.
jgray
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object of mass m = 2.3±0.1 kg is moving at a speed of v = 1.25±0.03 m/s. Calculate the kinetic energy (K = 1 mv2) of the object. What is the uncertainty
in K?

Homework Equations



k=1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have figured out that the kinetic energy is 1.8 J, but how do I figure out the level of uncertainty for this question? We do not use derivatives yet.
Can I take the equation for uncertainty of a power and uncertainy of a constant and add them together? :
change in z= k change in x
=1/2 * 0.1kg

change in z= nx ^n-1 * change in x
=2 * 1.25 ^2-1 * 0.03

then add them together to give an uncertainty of + or - 0.125?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When multiplying/dividing uncertainties, you just add the ratios in quadrature. But in my opinion it is easiest to just do
σ_{k}^{2} = (∂_{k}/∂_{m})^{2} * σ_{m}^{2} + (∂_{k}/∂_{v})^{2} * σ_{v}^{2}
when you learn uncertainties a little more in depth, I think you will find it is much easier to use that with larger expressions.
 
Last edited:
sorry I don't really know what that means though
 
Panphobia said:
When multiplying/dividing uncertainties, you just add the ratios in quadrature. But in my opinion it is easiest to just do
σ_{k}^{2} = (∂_{k}/∂_{m})^{2} * σ_{m}^{2} + (∂_{k}/∂_{v})^{2} * σ_{v}^{2}
when you learn uncertainties a little more in depth, I think you will find it is much easier to use that with larger expressions.
That's fine when uncertainties are given in terms of standard deviations. It might not be appropriate when given in terms of ±.
If the lengths of two components to be manufactured have specs of ±1mm, and they are to be joined end to end, then the uncertainty in the total length is ±2mm. An engineer relying on the total uncertainty being only ±√2mm would soon be out of a job.
A key issue is what is the definition of 'uncertainty' here. If it means standard deviation then you first have to convert the ± data to a standard deviation, and for that you need to know the distribution of the error. In particular, consider the case of measurements taken by eye against a graduated scale. The measurer will round to the nearest unit on the scale. The error therefore has a uniform distribution, ± half the scale unit size. The sum of two such measurements has a different distribution.
jgray, unless you have been taught to use Panphobia's formula for such questions, I suggest just considering the extreme values for the energy that can arise from the ranges of possible values for mass and velocity.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top